schools should teach students about specific careers and jobs instead of general subjects.
Nowadays, the prevailing attitude toward education is students should learn a variety of subject. But todays by emerging many sciences, we need more specialists that it results in a job-oriented education. In my viewpoint, schools should make professionals for future jobs.
At first, some material that is thought in school is not necessary for special major and soon the students forget these subjects. Also they do not act well in these areas since they know they do not use it later. Therefore, they seems waste their time at these classes. For example, Industrial engineering students do not need to know about poem or literature. And when universities force them to get these courses, students do not incline to have a good performance on the classes.
Consequently, learning general subjects waste the students' time in which they could be more efficient.
As a second reason, learning material must tailor with job future and universities should prepare their students for future careers. So, it is reasonable to teach them job-oriented subjects. Hands-on education contributes to have experts for science- oriented job that are able to tackle with specific subject matter in which others do not have capability to solve it. Take a gain an industrial engineer as an example. He is specialist in his career and a mechanical engineer cannot replace with him in a factory or give special advice tailored to the problem related to industrial.
In conclusion, school should prepare students for future job. They must put a great importance on students' time and devise a curriculum for their major that it does not waste students time. I strongly believe schools should teach students a job-oriented subject instead of general ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-26 | yassaman | 85 | view |
| 2017-09-17 | pouria_akb | 90 | view |
- Essay topics: TPO 49- Independent writingDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new f 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 53-Integrated Writing-Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- Tpo 50 - Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage. 3
- TPO 33 Integrated Writing Task 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...oon the students forget these subjects. Also they do not act well in these areas sin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'seem'
Suggestion: seem
...ey do not use it later. Therefore, they seems waste their time at these classes. For ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 24, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to general'
Suggestion: to general
...n the classes. Consequently, learning general subjects waste the students time in whi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 281.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21352313167 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83666281819 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55871886121 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3164675202 48.9658058833 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.1764705882 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.6045352989 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334220275393 0.236089414692 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109192469537 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108816483345 0.0737576698707 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17701899039 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999460309849 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.