Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should
governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways)?
Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay.
Properly allocating budget to develop medical, educational, military, recreational and public facilities is a challenge for all governments in charge. When it comes to the question that should government spend more money to improve whether public transportation or highways and roads? People adopt different attitudes. On the one hand there are people who believe that improving highways and roads reduces roads accidents and provide more safety for people. On the other hand, others believe that developing and rejuvenating public transportation is a must for every large city. I hold confidence on the latter opinion since I believe it has profound influence on society and people’s life.
Air pollution is the most challenging issue that every large city facing with. Moreover, a substantial amount of pollutant materials is produced by cars which their number is drastically increasing. Therefore, developing public transportation assist government to reduce toxic environmental pollutants and conserve environment. Furthermore, decreasing the combustion of petroleum, gas and oil, not only reduces air pollution but also preserve non-renewable resources. Therefore, such priceless resources can be utilized in more effective way not just for travelling around.
In addition, developed public transportation may also reduce traffic congestion and improve traffic flow. In fact, as much as people initiate to utilize public transportation, the number of cars which run into streets and roads will decrease whereby people will rarely stick in traffic. Moreover, traffic noises will also be disappeared and people can live in more peaceful city. Besides, people may also save their time and money since public vehicles fares are less than the money people should spend driving by their private cars. Apart from these, people have the opportunity to socialize with their friends and also find new friend by utilizing public transportation, therefore, they will feel a sense of community.
In summary, developing public transportation facilities reduces air pollution, preserve natural resources, reduce traffic congestion and give people opportunity to more socialize. In other words, it assists people to have more peaceful life. Such advantages of developing public transportation facilities are enough to give priority over improving highways and roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-13 | Meysam-Khan | 76 | view |
| 2017-07-02 | farzanehoseini1990 | 70 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If people have the opportunity to get a secure job they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying 67
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to s 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rity over improving highways and roads.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, apart from, in addition, in fact, in summary, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2024.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7994269341 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07116277456 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555873925501 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 618.680645161 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5558558019 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.526315789 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245534406236 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0828536166368 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098543205811 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158140358295 0.150856017488 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718715586966 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 58.1214874552 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 10.9000537634 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.