Should parents make decisions for their teenage children?
Taking care of one’s children is always a taxing job. It is a huge responsibility for parents to raise their kids with good attitude and behavior that will aid them with developing interpersonal relationships in future. Usually parents take decisions for their kids until a certain age. But it is a controversial topic as to until what age parents should make decisions for their children. Some people mature early- they know what is good and socially and morally acceptable while some take time understand the ways of human life. So, it is always debatable whether a parent should make decisions for their teenage children. I, for one, believe that teenagers should be allowed to make their own decisions.
Teenage is the time we start to grow. We start to learn things about the world that were incomprehensible as a kid. While on this learning stage, if we let teenagers make their own decisions, it imparts in them a sense of freedom in controlling their own life. They learn to be responsible for their own actions. Even if they make mistakes; they can learn from it which adds to a valuable life experience. This helps to prepare them for future endeavors of life.
Another reason I hold this belief is because they have a chance to figure out what is good for them what is detrimental. They can choose a field for their study, career or interest which brings out the best in them. Those children who follow their interest can be passionate about things and can exceedingly contribute to the field. They are the future of the world and the world can benefit a lot from such passionate youths.
Thus, I think letting teenagers handle things on their own is a good idea although it does not mean that they should be allowed to do whatever they want. It should be the role of parents to keep a close eyes on the teenage children and provide them with proper guidance they need to advance with their lives; not necessarily take the decisions themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-02 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-02 | Pooja dave | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | docaotri123 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | docaotri123 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-20 | yusra | 86 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 58
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 63
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well-being of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law is to make as 66
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted... 72
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of video rental stores.“In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are f 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... developing interpersonal relationships in future. Usually parents take decisions for the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, while, as to, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 343.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73177842566 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60792997961 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492711370262 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0932219624 48.9658058833 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4210526316 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0526315789 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.10526315789 5.45110844103 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.479170160033 0.236089414692 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174688978559 0.076458572812 228% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188472728474 0.0737576698707 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289284364262 0.150856017488 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.186125037226 0.0645574589148 288% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 11.7677419355 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 86.8835125448 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.