Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
It is always a debatable issue when it comes to comparing men and women. However, in this case, I agree that men and women are not equally suited for many tasks due to the prevalent inherent differences. If we look around and inspect our surrounding, we can see various jobs that are performed on a daily basis each requiring a set of skills and labor. These requirements set a bar as to whether someone can perform the task or not: be it a man or a woman.
To look at this scientifically, we can go back to observe the evolution of human being. It is stated that men had to forage to feed the family whereas women were the caretakers. Men had to hunt, gather resources as well a s protect family from threats and women mostly took care of the offsprings. This unanimously mutated men to be stronger thereby changing men and women physiology. So, men are more suitable for tasks that require physical power than women.
If we observe our task environment, the suitability of a specific gender for the job becomes lucid. Most of the people working in a factory, farm, mines are men. These jobs require hard physical labor which men are evolved for. On the contrary, we can see most of the caregivers, nurses, babysitters are women thus supporting the statement.
Although it is obvious that not all tasks suit both men and women equally, hen it comes to tasks requiring intellectual skills, both men and women have shown equal competence. We have leaders who have led the country to progress, CEOs who increased the company value - both men and women. Even though there are some tasks that can be performed by both men and women, same cannot be said for all tasks. It is well observed that most arduous job employ men for the maximum output.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Arpit Sahni | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Sumaiya Mila | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rahulkcr97 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Warafta | 75 | view |
- According to a recent report by our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies act 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- "Manned space flight is costly and more dangerous. Moreover, the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the cost and risks associated with se 47
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 58
- Should parents make decisions for their teenage children 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...and labor. These requirements set a bar as to whether someone can perform the task or not: be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n had to hunt, gather resources as well a s protect family from threats and women...
^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'task'.
Suggestion: task
... men and women equally, hen it comes to tasks requiring intellectual skills, both men...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, thus, well, whereas, as to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 2235.4752809 64% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61217948718 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5662967885 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5287086863 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.6470588235 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3529411765 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88235294118 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325483513522 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112167935424 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101451240017 0.0758088955206 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199008552484 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348161310262 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 14.1392134831 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.