Some companies provide important products or services, but these products or services also lead to damage on the environment. As a consequence, some people claim government should resort to greater penalty, tax, and fine to contain the harm made by these companies, while many others believe there are better solutions. Which do you think is the better way?
Some people think that the government should find others policies to contain the harm made by these companies. However, I think the government sould resort to greater penalty, tax and fine to limit the harm from these firms. Accordingly, I strongly agree with the statement for the following reasons.
First of all, to contain the harm for environment, the government cares about influence, and enforcing the greater penalty can give companies more influence on protecting the environment. For example, when the famous company, TSMC, created the new wafer that might have negative impact on the surrounding rivers, the government made a severe rule that limit the number of wafer every year. Moreover, if TSMC produced the number of wafers more than number in regulation, the manager would be put in jail for at least 3 years. As a result, TSMC always fellow the strict rule and never broke it. However, if the goveronment never punished TSMC by law, TSMC might harm the surrounding rivers continuously. What’s more, more people might get sick because of contaminated rivers. Obviously, strict punishment for these companies is really important to environment.
Last but not least, to limit the harm for environment, the official places emphasis on money, and taxing and fining more from companies that harm the environment can help the official earn more money. For instance, if the official starts to tax companies due to releasing harmful chemicals into environment in Taiwan, the official can more than 50 million out of a year. Furthermore, the official could also obtain extra money by fining a company which does not follow the law to produce environmentlly friendly products. As a consequence, the official can use these money to improve the environment by others approaches such as planting more trees and constructing the public transportation. Yet, if the official never taxes from companies, the official would have no money to do others thing for environment. In addition, these companies might start to release harmful chemical without fine. Apparently, taxing from corporations is helpful for the government to maintain the environment.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the government should resort to greater penalty, tax, and fine to contain the harm to evnvironment by these companies. After all, the government focuses on influence and money.
- It is important to have rules about the kind of clothing people should wear to go to work and school Do you agree or disagree with this statement 76
- Some people believe that it is important to follow traditions even when though those traditions conflict with or are quite different from their own individuals preferences Do you agree or disagree 86
- Summarize the points in the lecture being sure to explain how they address the specific concerns about forest fires described in the reading passage 75
- Some companies provide important products or services but these products or services also lead to damage on the environment As a consequence some people claim government should resort to greater penalty tax and fine to contain the harm made by these compa 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
... As a consequence, the official can use these money to improve the environment by others ap...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, really, so, after all, at least, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 15.1003584229 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 43.0788530466 35% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.0752688172 347% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 378.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30158730159 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88012022711 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497354497354 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4477265094 48.9658058833 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.473684211 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8947368421 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0526315789 5.45110844103 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2445868361 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898215766046 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896889399888 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193451486362 0.150856017488 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818060794811 0.0645574589148 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.