Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
All species which currently inhabiting on the planet have an impact on it, humans as one of them also influence the Earth. While one believes that people active in a positive way rather than in a negative one, I strongly believe that human beings destroy our planet by performing some particular actions.
The first thing to mention is that nowadays with the high level of globalization more and more plants and fabrics are being built. Though people take their attention to the questions of ecology and protecting environment near such industrial zones, there is still a problem of severe emissions which may affect negatively on animals, plants, and people of that region. For example, some years ago the officials in my town decided to build a plant nearby; they allowed cutting down the forest. All these actions led to problems, because most of rare animals having lived in that forest had died because of the lack of food and shelter.
Moreover, people damage our planet even by performing routine things like driving a car or bike, lighting a fire at picnics or throwing away trash in the streets. I think that for last few years the number of cars and vehicles has increased significantly. By realizing CO2 out, we damage the protective layer of our planet, thus we have a problem of a greenhouse effect. Not a news that the temperature on the planes is continuing to grow and that the climate is changing. In the end it will lead to such problems as emerging animals which will be under the threat of extinction or popping up new kinds of diseases which will be dangerous for humans.
To sum up, personally I think that people have a negative impact on the Earth rather than positive one, because some of their actions lead to great ecological problems.
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town—Adams Realty and Fitch Realty—Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom 58
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage. 3
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the president of Amburg's Chamber of Commerce."Last October the city of Belleville installed high-intensity lighting in its central business district, and vandalism there declined within a month. The city of 63
- In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live; for example, 85
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high-quality wool fabric, we discontinued production of 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
.... While one believes that people active in a positive way rather than in a negative one, I strong...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 376, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...e a problem of a greenhouse effect. Not a news that the temperature on the planes is c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for example, i think, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1977.66487455 74% => OK
No of words: 306.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79738562092 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54958934474 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 212.727598566 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607843137255 0.524837075471 116% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 618.680645161 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.3241514707 48.9658058833 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 100.406767564 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135959969159 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440326118317 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446072995355 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881259665353 0.150856017488 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522748881437 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 10.9000537634 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 86.8835125448 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.