Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Our earth has a vital role in our lives. It enhances our progress endlessly because it encompasses our core. Therefore, I adamantly agree that the earth being harmed by the human activities for two reasons.
First of all, human activity has a crucial impact on our environment. Utilizing the cars and building industrial factories enhance the pollution. For example, as we know, all the cars and factories emit a poisonous gas through the environment which considerably influences the climate. Moreover, These harmful gases increase the global warming through the weather which has a negative influ...
- uestion:Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 58
- TPO 21 q2 For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 65
- DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH FOLLOWING STATEMENT TECHNOLOGY HAS THE GREAT EFFECT ON CHILDREN LIFE?. 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to us 63
- TPO-13 - Integrated Writing Task Private collectors have been selling and buying fossils, the petrified remains of ancient organisms, ever since the eighteenth century. In recent years, however, the sale of fossils, particularly of dinosaurs and other lar 68
Comments
Essay evaluation report
the earth being harmed by the human activities for two reasons.
the earth is being harmed by the human activities for two reasons.
Sentence: So, all the daily activities doing by people cause a dramatic effect on our ecosystem because, nowadays, all people could not do any task or duties without using their cars, working in a full-time job every day pushes them to use this services.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and services
human activities harmful to the earth.
human activities are harmful to the earth.
Not only It boosts the pollution, but also it utilizes the natural resources without refunding.
Not only does It boost the pollution, but also it utilizes the natural resources without refunding.
----------------------
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 22 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 336 350
No. of Characters: 1674 1500
No. of Different Words: 187 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.281 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.982 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.651 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 124 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 100 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 44 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.684 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.984 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.632 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.314 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.499 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.129 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 15.1003584229 13% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 52.1666666667 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1726.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 336.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1369047619 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74000321722 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.5241955195 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8421052632 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6842105263 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.10526315789 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182723863381 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648757013597 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724941416722 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123391188086 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0201252606146 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.