Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Life of all human related to the Earth, so protected from earth is an indispensable issue for both the governments and their people. This matter that whether human activities by humans make the better place on the earth or not is controversial with which the governments and environmental protectors around the world have been struggling for a long time. Although some people may say that human activities help to make a better place to live on the earth, I as well as many others believe that many human’s activities damaged the earth. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, an important reason why human activity has a bad effect on Earth is that, over the past decades, air pollution increase because of the increasing cars and factories over the earth. Every year, scientists measure the presence of air pollution than the last year. By enhancing the number of cars and factories, the amount of the unsuitable supplies increased. They had an adverse effect not only on the earth, but it also harmed the health of humans and animals. This air pollution has an unhealthier material like aside sulfuric and carbon dioxide which harmed the ozone layer of the earth’s atmosphere. By damaging the ozone layer, the overall temperature of the earth increase. Moreover, the more increasing the earth’s temperature, the more melting the ice sheets on the polar regions and rising sea levels, which this phenomenon has an unfavorable influence on the animals on north and South polar like bears, sea lions, and penguins. A number of animal species have gone extinct, and many more are endangered. It is true that human activities such as making cars and new factories are able to improve the quality of human’s life, but they have a catastrophic impact on soil, air, and water on the earth. Thus, making of handful activities by human are able to destroy the terrestrial.
Another reason for this point of view is that many human activities damaged the natural scenery of wildlife. In today’s modern world, because of the growth of the population, many people start a large amount of construction, they want to erect a building to live on it or use for facilitation their life. As a matter of fact, they destroy a beautiful natural scenery wildlife preserved and change the landscape such as dense forests, vast meadows, and gentle, rolling hills. For example, in my country there were a lot of country sides that have natural scenery, but, after several years, many people started to construct and destroy it. As a result, people for their need damaged a lot of spots in the world to have a better life.
In conclusion, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I personally believe that human activities have a much more negative impact on the earth than to make a good place for living people chiefly due to increasing the air and water pollution because of the many cars and factories and damaging the wild landscape.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important aspect of a job is the money a person earns Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Grades encourage students to learn. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 76
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Improving schools is the most important factor in the successful development of a country. Use specific reasons to support your answer. 73
- People do many different things to stay healthy. What do you do for good health? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, i feel, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result, as well as, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2516.0 1977.66487455 127% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92367906067 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71081050799 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477495107632 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 789.3 618.680645161 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.9575775387 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.8 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.55 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 5.45110844103 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32175457235 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104097099195 0.076458572812 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991891314698 0.0737576698707 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212498110133 0.150856017488 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942024881881 0.0645574589148 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.