Some people believe that Earth is being harmed by human activity. Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It it incontrovertible fact that Earth has changed in the aftermath of human activity. However, those changes are not entirely positive and in fact they are damaging and far-reaching. I firmly believe that Earth is being harmed by human activity and I will provide some supporting explanations in the subsequent paragraphs.
First of all, all industrial activity in manufactories within city areas and conducted by humans have a major impact on our environment. A great amount of greenhouse gases has been released from working factories. Consequently, that causes abnormal climate changes like global warming and deterioration of the natural life. Moreover, that activities affect our lives as a human beings when we inhale the contaminated noxious air. For example,10 years ago in my beautiful village was built up a massive manufactory producing twisting jar caps and toppers. This production requires a work of multitudinous machineries that emit extremely dangerous gases. In vicinity of that factory there is no longer green park, since the establishment of that factory. It is mostly due to the adverse gases from chimneys and all toxic liquids which destroyed the extant green park. The activity of the factory's work is lead by people, hence they cause harm on the environment. Since, there are numerous factories scattered all around the World, our entire planet is on stake.
In addition, the negative human activity on Earth is profoundly manifested via deforestation. That process unfortunately has taken place in every country. No one can deny that people eradicate forests in order to build up apartments or commercial centers. Deforestation is severe factor in Earth's deterioration, because forests help in climate regulations and other manifold functions such as wind protection for some wind sensitive crops. If vast areas of trees are destroyed, that will lead to a huge implications not only for crops, lands and species but also for the entire Earth. As a matter of fact, mankind will be afflicted too owing to the fact that with no growing crops no comestibles will be available. I will never forget when I was on the way to my brother's city and saw how a part of a forest was being destroyed. It supposed to be substituted with a shopping center. All that activity was conducted by people, thus they caused harm on the planet for some pennies.
In a nutshell, I believe that people cause more harm on the Earth than making it better place to live and it can be proved as we take in account some activities. Some of them are managing factories in a straddles of a living areas, which causes consequences on greeneries. Plus, deforestation is a serious issue as well, because it blocks some natural cycles and deteriorate agricultures in some cases.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Only people who earn a lot of money are successful Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Different people influence our lives in different ways How Illustrate your answer with specific examples 73
- Some people believe that Earth is being harmed by human activity Others feel that human activity makes the Earth a better place to live What is your opinion Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- You have received a gift of money The money is enough to buy either a piece of jewelry you like or tickets to a concert you want to attend Which would you buy Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 76
- It has recently been announced that a new restaurant may be built in your neighborhood Do you support or oppose this plan Why Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: It
It it incontrovertible fact that Earth has ch...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 379, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'being'?
Suggestion: being
... activities affect our lives as a human beings when we inhale the contaminated noxious...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'implication'?
Suggestion: implication
...are destroyed, that will lead to a huge implications not only for crops, lands and species b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 202, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a straddle' or simply 'straddles'?
Suggestion: a straddle; straddles
... Some of them are managing factories in a straddles of a living areas, which causes consequ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'area'?
Suggestion: area
...ng factories in a straddles of a living areas, which causes consequences on greenerie...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, first of all, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2316.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 457.0 407.700716846 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06783369803 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97827009293 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562363238512 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6422345497 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.64 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.28 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27502281109 0.236089414692 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713676941341 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887978030018 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181500563349 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605736063732 0.0645574589148 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 86.8835125448 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.