Currently, every technology company is trying hard to catch up with the completion of the market each year several new advancements are coming to attract the audience. So, in the constantly changing world, some people want to be up to date with the new technology and some wants reliability in their devices. I would prefer to buy the new technology after its adoption by many people. I think that way for two main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
Firstly, I prefer reliability over fashion which means that I want to use the technology who is more reliable than the newest in the market. I do not want to be run around if it got some problems or it is a fishy deal. There are many fake companies who try to sell you the products in the name of most up to date tech. of the market. For instance, once my friend bought a music pod from the not very famous company who offered the state of the art technology. They said this product uses the artificial intelligence for the recommendations it will also monitor your daily activities. Later it was found that it was a fishy deal he didn’t research about the company and product.
Secondly, it is better to know about the product beforehand because it might have some software or hardware problems from the company end. For example, my friend upgraded his graphics card for playing FIFA18 for his computer without consulting with anybody. He only checked online found they are the newest in the market. Later, he found that these are not compatible with his old motherboard also they had installation problem driver was not detecting the hardware. So he had to change the full motherboard and had bought the new driver for that. So, from the above example, I would say it is better to buy products after confirming from many people.
In conclusion, in the fast-changing world, I would prefer to confirm the reliability of product from many people because it saves you from buying a trap and it also tells you what changes might have to accommodate.
- If you could change one important thing about your country, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answers. 3
- If you could change one important thing about your country, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answers. 3
- If you could change one important thing about your country, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answers. 3
- Do you agree or disagree? One can learn a lot about another people from the books and movies that he likes. 63
- Some people like to buy a piece of technological device as soon as it is available in the market Other people prefer to buy it after many people have adopted it Which do you prefer 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 274, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'wants'' or 'want's'?
Suggestion: wants'; want's
...o date with the new technology and some wants reliability in their devices. I would p...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Of
...ts in the name of most up to date tech. of the market. For instance, once my frien...
^^
Line 2, column 431, Rule ID: STATE_OF_THE_ART[1]
Message: Did you mean 'state-of-the-art'?
Suggestion: state-of-the-art
...not very famous company who offered the state of the art technology. They said this product uses...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1977.66487455 84% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68067226891 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63191464745 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509803921569 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4471439911 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8333333333 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215521667587 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707520213025 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087366553643 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149778440829 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0790225562541 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 10.9000537634 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 86.8835125448 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.