Some people learn by reading about things. Others learn by doing things. Which of these methods of learning is better for you?
We learn new things during the lifetime. When we are young, we learn from our parents, our school, or elderly people. On the contrary, when we are getting older, we learn from older people than us or even the younger generation. Not only to learn from surrounded us, but also we can learn by doing or reading something. However, do you learn by reading or doing things more efficiently? Personally, I prefer to learn by doing things rather than reading.
To begin with, to learn arts and sciences by doing. They have complicated structure and you can never learn this structure without practicing it. For example, I learnt to draw gravure painting in 2016. Before I started to get a drawing class, I read lots of drawing books, which taught technics of better drawing, and I could not handle it. After that I had decided to get in drawing class and met my teacher. She persuades me to draw again and again, and by doing this my drawing technics become advanced in a year. It is same for most of the branch of science. To illustrate, the computer programming has never been learnt by reading, you should practice it.
Secondly, to learn physical activities by doing. You cannot learn swimming from the books, you should get into the pool. For example, I am a professional skier. When I was at 12 years-old, my parents and I went to Geneva for visiting my aunt. We went to Alpine mountains and I saw the skiers. My parents rented a skiing equipments and I started to ski. I fell lots of times, however, the next day, I skied vey well.
In brief, although to learn new things by reading is available, to learn by doing is more successful process from learning new things. Many people support that learning by reading cause less mistakes than learning by doing. However, I do not believe it. Everyone can make a mistake all lifetime. The important thing is learning the mistakes and never do it again. So, learning by doing help us to examine these mistakes again and again.
- Dinosaurs are ectotherm or endotherm? 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. 70
- Some people learn by reading about things. Others learn by doing things. Which of these methods of learning is better for you? 60
- Altruism 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? High school should allow students to study the courses that students want to study. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to swim'.
Suggestion: to swim
...l activities by doing. You cannot learn swimming from the books, you should get into the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in brief, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 352.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.61363636364 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50175558193 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505681818182 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 9.59856630824 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.6003584229 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.1344086022 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4959031741 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.1481481481 100.406767564 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.037037037 20.6045352989 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 18.0 4.88709677419 368% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411332399993 0.236089414692 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112525065064 0.076458572812 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102117977188 0.0737576698707 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241008719815 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107574407755 0.0645574589148 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.8 11.7677419355 58% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 58.1214874552 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.1575268817 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.57 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 86.8835125448 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.0537634409 72% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.