Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television.
A glance at people’s attitude toward decisions in the past and now, bright to the light of question that has provoked a debate several times, namely, whether attending a live performance is more enjoyable or watching the same event on television. In my opinion, attending a live performance is better choice for three reasons.
The foremost reason why I am supporting this idea lies in the fact that going to outside is preferable than standing at home. For example, I spend lots of my time in home at weekdays, on the other hand at the weekends I do not want to stay at home. Moreover, when you go to the live performance, you should dress up new clothes and make up on your face. It encourages the personal development such as self-reliance and self-confident. Therefore, attending some interactive events are better solution.
Another subtle point that I should deem is the fact that meeting new people. Attending some sport activities or concerts with friends so you can meet their friends too. To illustrate, I work for a company but my best friend work as a graduate student at the university, so my college did not know to her before they met in the rock music concert. After they met in the concert place, they fell in love to each other. Moreover, they are getting married in this August. So, I think it is the best example for socializing.
Admittedly, many people think that staying at home is safety and security. For instance, some people drink too much and may harm to you. It is not acceptable reason for me because every performance hall have own security and they can protect to you. As a matter of fact, there is not the same opinion about making decision all over the world.
Due to aforementioned discussion explored in the previous statements, I strongly assert that attending the live performance is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television; even though many people support the opposite idea.
- Alturism 3
- Fossil Fuels 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Attending a live performance is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television. 70
- Some people learn by reading about things. Others learn by doing things. Which of these methods of learning is better for you? 60
- Dinosaurs are ectotherm or endotherm? 75
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, such as, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1977.66487455 81% => OK
No of words: 335.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79087077437 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582089552239 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0605320777 48.9658058833 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3333333333 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6111111111 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38888888889 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257949158581 0.236089414692 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068221978971 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917168050121 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166481823701 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118988620253 0.0645574589148 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 10.9000537634 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.002688172 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.