Fossil Fuels
The reading and the lecture is about fossil fuels. Both of them gives information is about fossil fuels such as what they are and how they can form. They are the skeleton of the ancient plants or animals. They can describe also coal, oil, and natural gas and these are the energy for many purposes. However, the professor explains that they cause irreparable damage on the Earth.
First, the reading claims that fossil fuels cause global warming because of emission. The professor agree this point by saying that the fuels are risky. He states that the fuels cause air pollution, so its effect the Earth's atmosphere and cause increasing global temperature. Moreover, he also mention that they cause the natural disaster such as flood and acid rains.
Second, the article state that there is no any economical alternative for fossil fuels. The professor opposes this point by explaining that it is more expensive in terms of researching the place of fuels and extract from the ground. Many countries spend millions of dollars for extracting fuels in deeper side of the ground.
In brief, the article is mention that there is not any other choice and still continue to use them. On the contrary, the professor states that we can search another energy sources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | titoyos418 | 68 | view |
| 2024-04-13 | titoyos418 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-19 | saamaan | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | reza_fattahi | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | Nina Tsarevich | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
...ming because of emission. The professor agree this point by saying that the fuels are...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'mentions'.
Suggestion: mentions
...g global temperature. Moreover, he also mention that they cause the natural disaster su...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...Second, the article state that there is no any economical alternative for fossil f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, moreover, second, so, still, in brief, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1048.0 1373.03311258 76% => OK
No of words: 213.0 270.72406181 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92018779343 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34622504907 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549295774648 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.4417428132 49.2860985944 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.8571428571 110.228320801 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2142857143 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06452816374 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301030343293 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101836696467 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105391873463 0.0662205650399 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169234301159 0.162205337803 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101503106704 0.0443174109184 229% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 63.6247240618 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.