Some people think governments should spend as much money as possible exploring outer space (for example, traveling to the moon and other planets). Other people disagree and think governments should spend this money for our basic needs on Earth. Which one of these two opinions do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to support your choice.
Today There are several duties which had to been done by countries governments. Some of them are necessity such as spending money for their people's basic needs, making laws for their citizens, and some of them need big budget like exploring outer space.
First of all, There are several different climate conditions such as hurricanes, snowing and raining rapidly and harshly. Then, countries of our planet wanted to focus how can we solve it, and they thought that there are two method for normalizing that bad situations. The First is finding the new planets, the second is dropping down reasons of bad weather.
Let's think exploring outer spaces and seeking a new planets are thought after seeing a bad weather conditions firstly. Because, today's countries do not enough effort for decreasing effects of bad conditions down. And, the poor countries have not more money for declining their activities which impacts their environments. Although, there are laws for urging all countries, that rules not impact positively. For these reasons, some big countries such as USA, Russia, China, etc have started their space explorations recent years, and they want to figuring that problem out in the future for their life.
Let's consider, spending money for citizens of countries basic needs such as, eating, transportations, travelling, working, etc. All of these facilities are necessary but they do not influence our places and weather negatively. And, that is duty for governments but these governments should think climate before supplying them. Because, climatic conditions and its problems are more important than people's basic needs.
In conclusion, taking account of all above reasons, all of our world countries have to supply basic needs to their people but other activities were done in outer space could not been done by poor governments. So, I definitely prefer that governments should spend their money for outer spaces findings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-11 | SERDARKOCAK | 76 | view |
- When in conflict, financially struggling school districts should offer classes in music rather than visual art. 80
- TPO-31: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? A zoo has no useful purpose. Use specific reasons and examples to explain. 70
- People do many different things to stay healthy. What do you do for good health? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Some people believe that the best way of learning about life is by listening to the advice of family and friends. Other people believe that the best way of learning about life is through personal experience. Compare the advantages of these two different w 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...uter space. First of all, There are several different climate conditions such as hurricanes, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ropping down reasons of bad weather. Lets think exploring outer spaces and seekin...
^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'planet'?
Suggestion: planet
...xploring outer spaces and seeking a new planets are thought after seeing a bad weather ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oblem out in the future for their life. Lets consider, spending money for citize...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... out in the future for their life. Lets consider, spending money for citizens o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, so, then, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1642.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 309.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31391585761 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62288101578 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 212.727598566 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550161812298 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8739449214 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.625 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3125 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338270851199 0.236089414692 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10939686438 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962431635477 0.0737576698707 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203970570829 0.150856017488 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0896118595017 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.