Some people think that scientists make the most important contributions to society. Other people think that the contributions of artists are the most important. Which position do you agree with? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As everything in life is like a coin that has two different sides, people must weigh the pros and cons before jumping to conclusions. Actually, people's attitudes towards this issue are varied from person to person. Even though some people may adamantly believe that artists are the most important to society than science, I strongly think such opinion lacks coherence to some extent. In my opinion, I think that scientists make the most important contribution to society due to the following reasons.
In the first aspects to point out is that many benefits quickly stem from scientists in society. I would like to mention noteworthy research conducted by CSR institute in India. The discovered results suggest that Seventy-Five percent of scientists indulge themselves in their researches to help their countries to improve the life of people and discovering how can to solve the problems. For instance, I remember when I was in my country, the government had a problem in transportation, moreover, the scientists spent a long of times to solve this problem to support the country to avoid this problem through they made a Subway to facilitate traffic.
secondly, scientists contribute to the widening people's horizon, which will influence profoundly on society. Admittedly, scientists have a close tie-in motivation and creativity to make life easier before the past. To illustrate more thoroughly, people in the past were used horse and camel to traveling from place to another place and they were spent days and weeks to reach in the other places they needed. therefore, scientists have discovered the machines which to help people to become their life is easier before. For example, I remember when I was in a high school I saw my father spent much time to travel from country to country by a ship but now he takes a few hours by plane to reach any place in the world, all of that due to the scientists.
To draw a conclusion, there has been a positive correlation between scientists and developing the world. they playing an important role to make the life of people to easier before.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 76
- TPO-36 3
- TPO-16 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The extended family (grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...made a Subway to facilitate traffic. secondly, scientists contribute to the widening ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... reach in the other places they needed. therefore, scientists have discovered the machine...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...en scientists and developing the world. they playing an important role to make the l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 52.1666666667 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 351.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98290598291 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78635100402 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.547008547009 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.9703372424 48.9658058833 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 5.45110844103 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254706530457 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876842969957 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813193427716 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151890361038 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801675502162 0.0645574589148 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.