Some people think that scientists make the most important contributions to society. Other people think that the contributions of artists are the most important. Which position do you agree with? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In recent times, there has been a widespread debate on whether scientists have more influential aspect on the community or not. While some people think artists have more significant roles in societies, I hold the opposite view. I believe that the role of scientists is more important in communities than the role of artists.
To begin with, scientists create several devices that make people’s life becomes easier. They invent many communication and entertainment devices that allow people to be more comfortable when they contact with each other and when they want to enjoy their free times. For example, the advent of the telephone by one of the best scientists allowed people to know all the details about their families and friends. Parents can contact their kids who are studying abroad in a very convenient way and short time. However, people in the past struggled when they tried to reach their families who live in distant places. They used to send letters that took more than two months to be delivered to the other side of the world. Furthermore, scientists invented the TV which makes people’ live much easier than before. They can enjoy their time watching some movies or some comedy shows. Indeed, this is all because of scientists’ inventions.
Adding to the previous point, scientists can help people live longer. They created many beneficial treatments that can cure severe diseases. For instance, in the past, people used to die whenever they had a cancer disease because they did not have a cure at that time. Nonetheless, today, scientist developed several treatments for cancer that can make people live at least ten years more than before. Obviously, scientists have a very essential role in people’s life.
In conclusion, I encourage governments to concentrate on educating people to become more interested in science rather than art. This is because scientists have a major role in developing most countries.
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- One of the threats to endangered sea turtle species is the use of nets by commercial shrimp-fishing boats. When turtles get accidentally caught in the nets, they cannot rise to the surface of the ocean to breathe, and they die. Some people suggest that th 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- When famous people such as actors, athletes, and rock stars give their opinions, many people listen. Do you think we should pay attention to these opinions? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities. U 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun communication seems to be countable; consider using: 'many communications'.
Suggestion: many communications
...apos;s life becomes easier. They invent many communication and entertainment devices that allow pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nonetheless, so, while, at least, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17350157729 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78800469437 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 212.727598566 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561514195584 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 618.680645161 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0811460264 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3157894737 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6842105263 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185879016851 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649671903716 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436043581582 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114309684852 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144834309283 0.0645574589148 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 86.8835125448 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.