Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is an important part of our lives. Some prefer classes with no discussions but with lectures. Others think the opposite. From point of view, it is more advantageous to have discussions with no lecture. I feel this way for two main reasons that I would explore in the following essay.
First of all, we need to take into the consideration that discussions would help students to stay focused because it is interesting when you can chat with your fellows and the professor. In contrast, lectures with no discussions are boring and, as a result, students may lose their attention. An apt illustration to support my idea is my personal experience. When I was taking English courses in America, I had the class with a lot of discussions. There every person was telling his or her opinion and that helped me not only to understand the complicated material but also stay concentrated. As a result, I was able to entertain and get that challenging material. For this reason, I think discussions are essential.
Secondly, discussions help a person to overcome a public fear. It is not a secret that in the future career you would need to perform in front of other people. Therefore, this skill is worthwhile and discussions help you to train this skill. And again the example that I have mentioned above is a compelling example. As you know everybody was telling their opinion and including me. As a kid I was timid and, consequently, initially, I was afraid to speak in public. However, continuous discussions helped me to eliminate this fear. In the current moment, I feel myself more confidently than ever before and I cannot believe that it is completely changed my life. Accordingly, discussions help you in order to succeed in the future.
To make a long story short, due to the aforementioned ground, I firmly believe that discussions are more beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | hnftskn | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | prayashpathak | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | hilmi | 60 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | hilmi | 60 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | Lao Zhiquan | 86 | view |
- TPO-43 - Integrated Writing Task Agnostids were a group of marine animals that became extinct about 450 million years ago. Agnostid fossils can be found in rocks in many areas around the world. From the fossil remains, we know that agnostids were primitiv 61
- You are planning to study abroad. What do you think you will like and dislike about this experience? Why? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 3
- TPO-21 - Integrated Writing Task Genetic modification, a process used to change an organism’s genes and hence its characteristics, is now being used to improve trees through genetic modification. It is possible to create trees that produce more fruit, g 76
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya wi 80
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e that discussions are more beneficial.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, i feel, i think, in contrast, you know, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 318.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87735849057 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98004551225 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556603773585 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7702316395 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.5 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4545454545 20.6045352989 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263039714304 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712965734897 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105828696145 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149136144485 0.150856017488 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111214357619 0.0645574589148 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 86.8835125448 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.