Some tourists prefer to travel to places that are very popular with other tourists: in the places. There are usually large crowds of visitors waiting to see a famous attraction such as a monument or historical buildings. All of the tourists prefer to travel to places that are not very popular with all the tourists, so that they can enjoy a vacation in place without large crowds of visitors. Would you prefer to travel to places that are very popular with other tourists or travel to places that are not very popular with other tourists? Why?
In today’s world, people travel more often than a few hundred years ago. Some people go to different countries for work, some travel as tourists to see places and acquainted themselves with distinct cultures, to explore the world and relax from daily routines. I would prefer to visit less famous places than go to a popular one. Let’s consider some pros and cons of those choices people have.
The first thing that needs to be said is that famous places are defiantly the most expansive ones. The tourists go there because of beautiful seen sights and historical monuments that can be attended. But if people plan their vacation they usually able to book the hotel and tickets beforehand and it could be not so high priced as closer to the season for tourism. Some believe that the high prices are a reason for a better quality of food and places where to stay, but some people disagree with that opinion. I hold the position that one can find a small place to eat with a nice and delicious meal and place to stay in less popular places for tourists. The price can’t be considered as vivid evidence of the best quality of anything at all.
The second reason for my position is that less famous places are less crowded and calmer. If I would go someplace to rest, I will want to be is a quiet and pretty place, to enjoy the sun and the beach, fresh air and the nature in whole. But I rather go camping in the mountains, there you can be by yourself with nature and don’t be afraid to distract with some noise or people around you. Imagining the picture of a Hawaii Island I can see a lot of tourists wandering around, resting on the beach, having loud conversations with their relatives, a lot of crowded cafeterias. It would be stressful for me to relax in a place like that. I would rather spend some time in solitude than in the crowded and noisy place because I live in a noisy city. And altering the environment is the key to rest.
To draw the conclusion, I can say that the weight of disadvantages is much more than advantages to rest in famous places for me. That is why I always chose the calm and quiet place to relax and to recharge my energy levels for the next year full of work.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they answer the specific problems presented in the reading passage 3
- Some tourists prefer to travel to places that are very popular with other tourists in the places There are usually large crowds of visitors waiting to see a famous attraction such as a monument or historical buildings All of the tourists prefer to travel 79
- Is it better to work on a project in a group or to work by yourself 80
- Should children spend most of the time playing and studying or they should be required to help the family with household chores, like cooking and cleaning 70
- People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment. Which ONE of the following three actions is MOST useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community? Why?- Plant trees and create 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... levels for the next year full of work.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 407.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45945945946 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4017572906 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503685503686 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3076425089 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5263157895 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4210526316 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.73684210526 5.45110844103 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220331585532 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682184418231 0.076458572812 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504329447407 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132631682282 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052951661194 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.01818996416 93% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.