At some universities, students take part in making decisions about the issues that affect daily life of everyone on campus, such as how many hours that the libraries should be open each day or what kinds of food should be served in the cafeteria. But at some universities, experts are hired to make these decisions, students almost never involved. Which approach do you prefer and why.
In this day and age, people have been appealing to democracy in various fields, including universities, which represent the truth and hope of a country. Thus, whether students should be involved in the decision process of school fairs has raised heated debate in social media. As far as I am concerned, I firmly support that university committee should take students’ demands into consideration, and the most effective way is to let students take part in making decisions.
Initially, students can provide essential references for decision making, for they are considerably familiar with issues affecting their daily lives. As we can see, the keystone of decision making is to improve both the academic atmosphere and students’ living standard. Thus, suggestions from students contribute most to what and how actions should be carried out. More precisely, as for how many hours the libraries should be open, experts may set fixed opening hours, claiming that it is more convenient for the administration. However, students are sometimes overwhelmed by a large amount of tasks such as assignments, competitions and presentations, especially when final week is coming. Therefore, if libraries can flexibly adjust the opening hours and provide all-night studying space, students won’t have to study deep into the night outside school.
In addition, students’ involving in the decision making process enables committee’s plans to be executed more smoothly. Students are in favour of plans that they have participated in, so they will cooperate with faculties to conduct them. Nevertheless, if experts raise points which contradict students’ urgent needs, students will strive to prevent the committee from carrying out the plan. For instance, our university put forward a strict regulation, stating that students should return dorm before 11pm. To the committee’s surprise, students gathered to reject it. Obviously, experts neglected that some students have joined internship programmes and were required to travel for business, thus they at times cannot avoid returning late because of flight delay.
Granted, some one may assert that students are so irrational that they usually cannot see the whole picture of the problems and are inclined to raise some impractical advice. Plausible as it sounds, this opinion does not hold water. We cannot deny that experts with rich experience are more professional and considerable than students. However, students, who are the real host of their university, desire to obtain some degree of autonomy. Universities should believe that they can integrate their various knowledge with practice to build a beautiful campus.
In conclusion, as for the above mentioned factors, I contend that although experts’ perspectives are of vital importance, students should participate in the decision making. Only in this way can the newly proposed plan be supported by students and be carried out efficiently.
- People in daily lives would frequently do the jobs that need creativity such as the job you have never done before Under this circumstance do you prefer to work alone or work with others 97
- When you are at work or study you may confront problems requiring to think about creativity For example you are given a task to complete that is very different from other tasks you do Would you prefer to work alone or work with others Use specific reasons 95
- 7.Some young people are free in the evenings or have days off at school, which way can bring them the most benefit?1)to accumulate work experience by a part-time job or volunteering in a community2)learning to play a sport3)learning to play a musical inst 86
- People in daily lives would frequently do the jobs that need creativity, such as the job you have never done before. Under this circumstance, do you prefer to work alone or work with others? 83
- Do you agree that it is better to work for business owned by someone else than to work for the business of one’s own family 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...te because of flight delay. Granted, some one may assert that students are so irratio...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, as for, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2535.0 1977.66487455 128% => OK
No of words: 452.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60840707965 4.8611393121 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05139990649 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58407079646 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 768.6 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1438393366 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.227272727 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22727272727 5.45110844103 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279911827166 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760040278017 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531060975855 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154969403945 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624907876899 0.0645574589148 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 10.9000537634 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.01818996416 120% => OK
difficult_words: 144.0 86.8835125448 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.