For the successful development of a country, it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children (five to ten years old) than to spend money on universities.
Education is one of the most important factors in the development of a society. Education starts from childhood and continues all the way through adulthood. The concept that we study in higher education is more advanced and sophisticated, but the things that students learn when they are in lower levels are more important and fundamental. There is a debate, whether a government should spend on higher education or the education of young children to be more successfully developed. While others think spending money on higher education has a more significant impact, I firmly believe that the opposite is ture. In this essay, I am going to explain three potential reasons to justify my beliefs.
First of all, the concepts learned by children in elemantry school are the foundation of what they will learn later in high school or university. If they do not learn basic things deeply, it would be so hard for them to understand other things. In a sense, the things we learn in younger years are like a skeleton and plays a significant role in supporting next parts that will add-up and the later things we will learn sit-on this skeleton.
Secondly, kids' brain are more flexible and ready to learn new things. Therefore, by spending more money on children's education, a government provides all the facilities for them and at the end we will have a thriving society. For example, kids in youger ages are more capable of learning new languages easily, while teaching the same thing to adults will take too long and it is costly. By spending less money on younger ones, we will achieve more.
Last but not least, it is more effective to find and discover students' interests. Help them follow the right path to achieve their goals. Finding out what you want in your life in earlier years is a big opportunity since you have lots of time to obtain it. As we get older, it is more difficult to change our path if we relize that we are on the wrong track. So, spending money and time on helping children to find out their talents would prevent lots of issues later in their lives.
In conclusion, as i mentioned above for the successful development of a country, it is more beneficial for a government to spend more money on very young children than to spend money on universities.
- employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day 65
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree It is easier for parents to raise children than it was 50 years ago 73
- Leaders must pay attention to the advice and opinions of other people (agree/disagree) 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment should spend on higher education or the education of young children to be mo...
^^
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ater in their lives. In conclusion, as i mentioned above for the successful deve...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72613065327 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63366565704 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505025125628 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.452595436 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05263157895 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361521345575 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113250406909 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140703818435 0.0737576698707 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245256369681 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194359470791 0.0645574589148 301% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 86.8835125448 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.