Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is viewed as a bad quality for a person to have. But now it is considered as a good quality of a person.
Through the ages, making decisions had been the key part of everyone’s life. Many people are of the opinion that the perspective of people toward slowly decision-making change through years from negative to positive. On the other hand, others cite that there is no difference between people’s opinion in the past and nowadays. I, as an individual, advocate the first group. I will pinpoint the most conspicuous aspects of this view in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, consulting with others is considered as time-consuming and weak point in the past which is necessary to make a critical decision these days. Although consulting with a qualified person have considerable benefits all the times, for years seeking for guidance had been viewed as a negative point. To clarify, the definition of being a strong person in the past was different from nowadays since kings were the most powerful one in the society which makes them the role model of people. Emperors decided in the dictator manner without listening to other’s advice. Therefore, deciding quickly without consultation was regular. Consequently, plenty of ordinary people followed this manner and if a wisdom one tried to ask for help, it considered as the failure in decision-making. Suppose a farmer who faced a dilemma about whether it is better to cultivate wheat or oat in order to have more profit. In this case, nowadays a clever farmer should consult with an expert who has information about climate and current market of grains. However, in the past, the farmer who decided quickly to cultivate one of the grains achieve prosperity.
Moreover, due to the simplicity of problems in the past, slow decision-making was a demerit. In other words, finding the best decision was straightforward because an intelligent person could find the solution quickly. Besides, contrary to popular belief, as time goes by, the advent of technologies neither help to make a decision nor simplify the problems. However, new problems which do not exist in the past arise. Accordingly, people require to think deeply to decide wisely, and it is undeniable that for making the right decision, one might think about various aspects. In my perspective, getting married is one of the most important decisions in life. In the past, couples marry with someone in their tribe, mostly cousins. So, the decision of marriage was not tough as now because couples came from the same family and they knew each other, and normal couples quickly make decisions. However, the emergence of the Internet creates a chance for individuals to find soul mate from different nations and cultures. In these circumstances, partners need more time to know each other and the people’s perspective about taking time for making decision changed because of increasing the complexity of decisions.
From what has been discussed above, I firmly believe that people’s opinion change during the time and taking time for making vital decisions do not consider as bad quality of a person and people are more likely need time to make a rational decision due to the need of consulting and increasing the complexity of problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-06 | DanyangTong | 70 | view |
| 2019-03-09 | farinazfalahpour | 73 | view |
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is viewed as a bad quality for a person to have. But now it is considered as a good quality of a person. 73
- TPO 40 76
- In some countries, people are no longer allowed to smoke in many public places and office buildings. Do you think this is good rule or a bad rule? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'thinking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: thinking
...past arise. Accordingly, people require to think deeply to decide wisely, and it is unde...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, consequently, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 52.1666666667 167% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2667.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1786407767 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89900766677 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51067961165 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 837.9 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.000715785 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.68 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291518421712 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667908966149 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675980013131 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186681132644 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824626579382 0.0645574589148 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 86.8835125448 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.