teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.
In this progressive and sophisticate world that we lives, teachers have significant effect on their students. People of all over the world have huge concern about their children notions. In this line of thought, some people believe that students should not be aware of teachers opinion about social or political beliefs, while others posits this notion, stating that teachers ought to speak about their ideas for pupils. I, personally, concur with the former group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First of all, in this modern era, students get their teachers as a role model, so students are not investigate about others views and get teacher's idea as a accurate opinion. To clarify, students mostly spend their day on school, and they are accepting their teachers as a perfect person. If teachers have a unique belief, students will follow the teachers way. Students are in the critical age, and they unable to get well-formed decision, so they need to become older to informed about their teachers notions of political and so on. I can allude to a personal experience when I was student, my teacher always spoke about their unique social view about having slave at home. Therefore, when I came back home I imitated him and told my parents I wanted slave. Consequently, my parents advised me and revised my immoral idea.
Secondly, it is a worse sight for either students or teachers, thus maybe teachers have strange view, and students transfer idea to headmaster. To be more specific, by doing so is plausible that dean make a decision to expulsion the teacher for protecting students from learning about strange view. For instance, I had a nice teacher in my music classes in school. But after one month, my teacher changed, I asked about him, secretory said that he sent out because of his presentation about politic views in classes. Had he not spoken about view, he would have continued works as a teacher.
To sum up, trainers should not speak about neither political nor social views in classrooms. Not only they make a vivid effect on the students mind, but also it has negative compact on career and encounter teachers with dilemma. As for this writer's advice, I urge parents to dedicate more time for their children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'we' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'live'
Suggestion: live
...gressive and sophisticate world that we lives, teachers have significant effect on th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'investigated'.
Suggestion: investigated
...rs as a role model, so students are not investigate about others views and get teachers ide...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t others views and get teachers idea as a accurate opinion. To clarify, students ...
^
Line 13, column 242, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...nter teachers with dilemma. As for this writers advice, I urge parents to dedicate more...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, for instance, first of all, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1977.66487455 96% => OK
No of words: 386.0 407.700716846 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94041450777 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54339765817 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556994818653 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6333788118 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.368421053 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3157894737 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26315789474 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.88709677419 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378030975109 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12421878865 0.076458572812 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784896432494 0.0737576698707 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250776882337 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348424376446 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.