There is nothing that young people can teach older people. Do you agree or disagree?
The 20th and 21th centuries are characterized by all the momentous changes, which have been made in human's lives. Perhaps the most important milestone of these two centuries is learning process. Stemming from this fact, a relevant question that is a moot point is whether older people could rely on teenagers' knowledge or not. Due to the controversial nature of this question there is not a general argument on this issue. I am, however to a great extent of the conviction that human beings regardless of their age have their own knowledge and experiences, which might patronize other people to address any problem. In the ensuing paragraphs some convincing reason will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that new ideas can provide fertile ground for people to recover from any critical situation. Indeed, if people run into huge problems, effective and fresh ideas could address successfully those difficulties. Broadly speaking, we all know that elder people have poor concentration and their power of mind has decreased over time. So, they can't surely interpret the phenomena and come up with fresh ideas. To elucidate more on this issue, the lifestyle are changing day in day out and young people are closer to changes. As a matter of fact, although old people are experienced and learned people and have experienced myriads of trials and tribulations overtime, their mind and views are obsolete and might not be useful to imitate. As a tangible example, whenever I face serious problems whether in my education or personal life, I prefer to get help from younger people or people with same age. Because I am of the opinion that I will provide with different new ideas and could choose the best way to handle my problems.
Another reason that cannot go unnoticed is that in today's hectic world, technological advancement has penetrated every single facet of our lives and young people are more inform of these technologies. To put it in general word, if elder people run into a problem with technology, no one better than adults could patronize them to overcome the problem due to the fact that old people have not experienced any technology during their life time. Going into the depth, not only can young people provide an opportunity for elder to get acquaintance with many latest version of technology but also can enhance their self- esteem and become a self-sufficient person. However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the countless merits it has, indisputably, young people are not mature enough to come up with effective and fresh ideas. In fact, elder people are experienced owing to the fact that they had coped with different difficulties in their personal life. Nonetheless, it does not make those preceding benefits pale.
In the light of the reason elaborated, I reiterate that learning from people regardless of their age could allow people to improve their life. Actually, young people can adopt themselves better to the available condition and are able to come up with effective ideas. In addition, with the advent of modern technologies, which elder people have not experienced, young people could provide old ones with a wide variety of new information.
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- TPO 34 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? One can learn a lot about a person from the types of friends this person has. 73
- People listen to music for the different reason and at different times. Why is music important to many people? 90
- Students are more interested in politics now rather than past. Do you agree or disagree? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
...tone of these two centuries is learning process. Stemming from this fact, a relevant qu...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teenagers'' or 'teenager's'?
Suggestion: teenagers'; teenager's
...t is whether older people could rely on teenagers knowledge or not. Due to the controvers...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... mind has decreased over time. So, they cant surely interpret the phenomena and come...
^^^^
Line 3, column 634, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
... old people are experienced and learned people and have experienced myriads of trials ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...experienced any technology during their life time. Going into the depth, not only can you...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 696, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...son. However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 438, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with a wide variety of new information.
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'nonetheless', 'so', 'broadly speaking', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'in general', 'as a matter of fact', 'by and large', 'to a great extent']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.214765100671 0.229887763892 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.16610738255 0.158761421928 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.11744966443 0.0866891130778 135% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0486577181208 0.046263068375 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0469798657718 0.0685040099705 69% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120805369128 0.118717715034 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0419463087248 0.0351676179071 119% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.76322395002 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0352348993289 0.0309702414327 114% => OK
Particles: 0.00503355704698 0.00188951952338 266% => OK
Determiners: 0.0771812080537 0.0887237588012 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0251677852349 0.0209618222197 120% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.011744966443 0.0139019557991 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3295.0 2387.08602151 138% => OK
No of words: 543.0 408.028673835 133% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06813996317 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.48200974243 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.362799263352 0.338922669872 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.244935543278 0.251872472559 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184162062615 0.174417080927 106% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136279926335 0.112833075102 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76322395002 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 212.727598566 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51197053407 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 62.3252442485 59.2087087015 105% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6684587814 116% => OK
Sentence length: 22.625 20.5533526081 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4432226456 48.84282405 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.291666667 120.699889404 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 20.5533526081 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.583333333333 0.644075263715 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.54480286738 126% => OK
Readability: 47.1185543278 45.7405998639 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.44230769231 1.45489161554 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203632602237 0.300154397459 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0727226127097 0.103427244359 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0645616619522 0.0752933317313 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.448800027169 0.497263757937 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124019812247 0.151897553556 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07940258402 0.114077575197 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578806146674 0.0781384742642 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.484267361342 0.336927656856 144% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0690202566766 0.067059652881 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159230644178 0.210909579961 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.016467096631 0.0618886996521 27% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.86379928315 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.91756272401 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 8.42114695341 119% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 2.4623655914 244% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.75985663082 145% => OK
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.