In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Throughout history, in all civilized societies, quality and quantity engendered copious controversies among people. Some people may hold the view that it is better to work swiftly and makes faults. However, other may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that it is beneficial to execute work effective and do not make error. As far as I am concerned, quality is better and people should focus on doing their jobs efficiency because not only does it save money and time, but also it helps company.
The first reason to point out is that performing jobs in a slow pace or with a great quality save money. To illustrate, it is inevitable for a person works in a fast pace to not makes mistakes. So when this happens he/she should spend more time on his/her job and fixing all the problem and this leads to working for a longer time. On the other hand, when this occur company must change his wage and pay him/her more fee. Therefore, company gain less profit and cannot enhance his reputation by building and produce another material. For example, if a clerk want to finish his job earlier he has to increase his speed and when this happen he causes problem and instead of living, he must spend more time on his work to correct all the error precisely. Also, if employees of company do their jobs with a high rate of awareness, it helps company to pay less wage to his employee and save money.
The most persuasive point is that quantity helps company. To demonstrate, when company concentrate on making less problems and error, it gives them chance to challenge other company and compete with them. Moreover, all people want to buy a very good product that some of them are crucial and other are necessary. In both case they choose a commodity that have a high quality and this really effect their choice. Hence, if company’s merchandises have a high quality, they are going to benefit more than other companies.
To summarize, due to saving money (and time) and help company to enhance its profit, it is more advantage to perform your work slowly and do not make any error. Consequently, it is highly recommended that companies hire people who finish their job precisely.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- TPO 12 - It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.test sth 60
- People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to become financially responsible adults children should learn to manage their own money at a young age Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- parent 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun problems is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ate, when company concentrate on making less problems and error, it gives them chanc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, therefore, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1800.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72440944882 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50955421808 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527559055118 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5008455847 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152366802999 0.236089414692 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053802044612 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654079192856 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103621076552 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0265953869703 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.