today students are more interested in politics than the past

Essay topics:

today students are more interested in politics than the past

Without a shadow of a doubt, these days students’ interest has exceedingly changed. However, an unanswered question in this area is whether nowadays students are into politics or not. Despite the arguments asserting that today students have never gotten into politics than ever, I believe otherwise, maintaining that students in the past are more interested in politics than today. There are two significant reasons as to why I hold this point of view.
First and foremost, the crux of the matter lies in the fact that these days students spend not any time on political matters, resulting in decreasing their urgency regarding political matters. To delineate, in recent decades, the course materials taught in each major of the schools or universities are dramatically specified. It means that majority of the students who are not in the political major are overwhelmed with their major-related courses, taking a large percentage of students’ time to hand in tons of assignments as well as study to ready for their exams. As a result, nowadays learners spend no time on political issues and materials, gradually affecting their keenness. To put it in the vivid picture, the more ones spend time on a specific subject, the more they are interested in it. However, back then the classes were not as specific as today, meaning that a part of the students’ time was spent on political materials which developed a strong interest in politics.
Another prominent motive to be stipulated is that students’ interest in politics is reduced because of not only their limited time but also their experiences. To elucidate this point, getting involved in political matters is synonymous with raising the amount of stress and hopelessness. I mean, being aware of political policies and materials opens students eye on terrible political decisions those affect their lives, which puts a lot of strain on students’ mind, and they experience horrible feelings such as depressing, hopeless, so on and so forth. Therefore, today students are unwilling to politics as an avoidance measure from being a stressful person. On the other hand, in the past decisions made by governments did not influence students' life as much as they are, so being engaged in political matters did not raise the level of the students’ stress.
Reflecting upon all the aforementioned grounds, one soon realizes that students have never disinterested in politics than these days. It is highly recommended to conduct research to gain students’ insight into politics.

Votes
Average: 9 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-02-16 maqi 70 view
2021-07-28 toriettttt 84 view
2020-09-09 toefl103 73 view
2020-09-07 bahar_93 90 view
2020-06-17 ranjbar53 87 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, as to, i mean, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25735294118 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91314150951 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536764705882 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9189353944 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.176470588 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487405340911 0.236089414692 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151061802969 0.076458572812 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13971407119 0.0737576698707 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307625409193 0.150856017488 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129587027522 0.0645574589148 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, as to, i mean, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 9.8082437276 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 408.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25735294118 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91314150951 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536764705882 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9189353944 48.9658058833 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.176470588 100.406767564 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487405340911 0.236089414692 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151061802969 0.076458572812 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13971407119 0.0737576698707 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307625409193 0.150856017488 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129587027522 0.0645574589148 201% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 11.7677419355 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 58.1214874552 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.