TPO-12 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
With availability of colleges and universities more and more people intending to have knowledge at various and diverse academic disciplines. Some people who have studied mathematics at his bachelor degree, likes to gain his master’s degree at physics science. This bring us an arguable question whether it is a good idea to have broad knowledge or not. As far as I'm concerned, I think that focusing on one particular area is more desirable. The reasons behind this standpoint is discussed in the following paragraphs.
To begin with, specializing in a specific subject is better to final a job in the future. In fact, nowadays, many of companies and factories required from their employees have a specialization in one subject. Also a person who is a candidate to employ in a job position at a firm, should be able to demonstrate a good knowledge in only one subject. By demonstrating an expertise at a particular discipline, people will be able to find a profession, as an employer ask them. For example, if someone want to work in a car manufacturing company as a senior mechanical engineer, s/he required to have particular knowledge merely at mechanical devices and systems, not at other areas such as electronic engineering and so on. Since, there are people who are familiar with many academic subjects such as civil engineering, electronic engineering but do not have a good expertise at any of them, they have difficulty in being recruited at a specific job. So, as you can see, employment activity for subjects with broad knowledge is problematic.
The second reason that support my standpoint to have expertise in one academic subject is that it is easy to study and focus on one area. In fact, when students narrow his to her university disciplines to one subject, they are able to understand and draw a connection between courses at university. For instance, if a student learns theoretical knowledge about a theory or concept such as thermodynamic laws in a course and then take an experimental course related to theoretical classes, s/he could be comprehend and grasp the thermodynamic laws well by performing experiment and comparing with theoretical knowledge, which learn from theoretical class. However, learning many courses that each of them has many formulas and concepts will be difficult task to do and student not only get confused but also they may not able to finish their studies. Therefore, it is easy to concentrate on one subject at university than to learn broad knowledge at different courses at university.
In conclusion, according to above-mentioned reasons, I would say that concentrating in one particular subject is more desirable because of finding a career at future better and because of studying easily. What an arduous tasks dealing with different theories at various subjects!
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-27 | ela87urb@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Kalima | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Pakshid | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | marysv | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | mohammadkmi | 78 | view |
- Some people think that government should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs Which one of these opinions do you agree with 73
- TPO 12 Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to have broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 87
- TPO-22 - Integrated Writing Task Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasol 73
- Some people prefer to live in a small town. Others prefer to live in a big city. Which place would you prefer to live in? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 60
- TPO-16 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 369, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... have broad knowledge or not. As far as Im concerned, I think that focusing on one...
^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s have a specialization in one subject. Also a person who is a candidate to employ i...
^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'good knowledge'.
Suggestion: good knowledge
...t a firm, should be able to demonstrate a good knowledge in only one subject. By demonstrating a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 498, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...loyer ask them. For example, if someone want to work in a car manufacturing company ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 52.1666666667 142% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2368.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 463.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11447084233 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13229756133 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516198704104 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 772.2 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2305954493 48.9658058833 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.631578947 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3684210526 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270100875391 0.236089414692 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099597872522 0.076458572812 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06884250818 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160369781451 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463435259523 0.0645574589148 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.