TPO 25 - Do you Agree/Disagree.
Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today’s lifestyles have experienced a dramatic change compared to the past. This change affected young people’s lives as well. In this regard, some young individuals still have an inclination towards past traditions, thus, help their society to a great extent. On the other hand, some have developed attitudes which prevent them from being a part of their society. As far as I know, there are reasons which lead the majority of the young people into holding the latter standpoint.
To begin with, today the social media have taken a large portion of young individual’s time. These media have gradually become popular in the past few years. While being beneficial at first, they threaten people’s lives to a great extent. Nowadays, young people spend so much time dealing with the social media; and this results in a lack of time to study, let alone benefiting one’s society. For example, a student who spends seven hours a day scrolling his or her Instagram account will definitely be in short of time if there is a beneficial activity, like a charity work, in his or her community.
The next reason has to do with one’s spending time with friends. One of the aspects of today’s lifestyles is that young individuals often hang around in the streets and then eat out in a fast-food restaurant. These developed attractive habits are a cause for the lack of interests in some people in helping their communities. For instance, one of my friend, Tony, goes out every night and returns home very late. Because of this habit, he ignores his duties in his family, like cleaning his room and buying food materials. As a result, he is now having a strong conflict with his parents who are angry with his way of life.
The last and the most important is a change in young people’s general behavior. The previously mentioned reasons acted as distractions; however, there are many young individuals who have become so arrogant and selfish that they will not help anyone even in their free times. They see themselves in a higher position than others, thus participating in a shared activity is a shame for them. This is a huge difference compared to the past. To further illustrate this issue, in the past, helping an elderly to cross a street brought honor to the helper. However, today many young people avoid doing such a thing because they have developed a negative view of these kinds of activities.
In summary, today’s young individuals are not willing to participate in their communities due to some distractions and some behavior changes. The social media, friends and arrogant behaviors are inhibiting them from being beneficial in their society. I hope there will soon be solutions to address this problem appropriately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-27 | PRACHI DAVE | 73 | view |
- TPO 12: Do you Agree/Disagree.It is better to have a broad knowledge of many academic subjects than to specialize in one specific subject. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 97
- TPO 25 - Do you Agree/Disagree.Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO 14: Do you Agree/Disagree.People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 17: Do you Agree/Disagree.Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO 5: Do you Agree/Disagree.People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment -doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, then, thus, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in short, in summary, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 40.0 43.0788530466 93% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2317.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 461.0 407.700716846 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02603036876 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63367139033 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82225502863 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 212.727598566 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533622559653 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8525417444 48.9658058833 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.68 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.44 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.04 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149028190754 0.236089414692 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458487419175 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043185920363 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893347187226 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262804128102 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 10.9000537634 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 86.8835125448 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.