Education is one of the most important aspect of each society. Different parts of the society highly depend on education. Therefore, improvements in education directly leads to improvements in other sections. So, it is dispensable to pay more attention to enhance the quality of education. There are more strategies in order to reach the high quality of education. One of these strategies is to raise the universities professor's salary. Some people refute that plan whereas others like me support it. From my point of view, increasing salary inspire professors to concentrate more on education , attract more talented graduations to work in a universities.
First and foremost, high salary provokes professors to spend much more time on researching and developing teaching skills. To put discussion into a wider context, if the professors do not receive enough money as a payment, they may get into financial troubles. So, their effectiveness will be decreased in instructing since they will have to take an extra job in other universities and companies so as to solve their financial problems and to support their life.
The second reason that I hold this opinion is that genius and skillful students prefer to get well paid jobs. According to that, among companies or organizations, one will be successful to catch their attention which offers high salary. For instance, my friend who is highly educated person. Among two suggested jobs, one was working as a professor in a university and the other working for an international company, choose the second option. It has brought great prosperity to my friend and made more profit for the company.
Taking into account all these factors, I think that universities should allocate much more money to their professors to increase the quality of education. In this way they are able to relieve economic burden on professors and boost their productivity and also absorb more talented people to work as a professor.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide 70
- Tpo 25 integrated task 3
- TPO 50 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 71
- TPO-40 - Independent Writing Task Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 550, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...point of view, increasing salary inspire professors to concentrate more on educat...
^^
Line 1, column 595, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...fessors to concentrate more on education , attract more talented graduations to wo...
^^
Line 1, column 643, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ct more talented graduations to work in a universities. First and foremost, hi...
^
Line 1, column 643, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a university' or simply 'universities'?
Suggestion: a university; universities
...ct more talented graduations to work in a universities. First and foremost, high salary pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 397, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...job in other universities and companies so as to solve their financial problems and to s...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'whereas', 'as to', 'for instance', 'i think']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.237142857143 0.229887763892 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.174285714286 0.158761421928 110% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0828571428571 0.0866891130778 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0485714285714 0.046263068375 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0514285714286 0.0685040099705 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111428571429 0.118717715034 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0371428571429 0.0351676179071 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.93926559531 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0571428571429 0.0309702414327 185% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0771428571429 0.0887237588012 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0142857142857 0.0209618222197 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00571428571429 0.0139019557991 41% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1971.0 2387.08602151 83% => OK
No of words: 319.0 408.028673835 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.17868338558 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48200974243 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.373040752351 0.338922669872 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294670846395 0.251872472559 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.225705329154 0.174417080927 129% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.169278996865 0.112833075102 150% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93926559531 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564263322884 0.524397521467 108% => OK
Word variations: 60.9207422841 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6684587814 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.7222222222 20.5533526081 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6360205333 48.84282405 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 120.699889404 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7222222222 20.5533526081 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.644075263715 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 47.1893068617 45.7405998639 103% => OK
Elegance: 1.40625 1.45489161554 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333946388088 0.300154397459 111% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.10225507463 0.103427244359 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0897854760299 0.0752933317313 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.498719655418 0.497263757937 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141770815882 0.151897553556 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129691364168 0.114077575197 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628377314031 0.0781384742642 80% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.23835123132 0.336927656856 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0142450173514 0.067059652881 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227249364602 0.210909579961 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472314055028 0.0618886996521 76% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.91756272401 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 13.6433691756 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.