TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
Throuhout history, teachers have always strived to indoctrinate their students with new and efficacious methods whereby help them to be insightfull and prosperous. In this sense, many pedagogical experts provide teachers with a lot of up-to-date methodes which could convey concepts in high rate. From many circles of researchers, an issue of concern turning into an obsession is how we approach on this high rated efficiency in teaching process. whereas some are inclinded toward the opinion that we should take some methods which take students in team-work projects, some people oppose that view by advocating the opinion that they should do their assignment solitary. I'm for one, interested into the first groupe and to some extend think that all job should be in this way. In what follow I will aptly substantiate my view points.
The first aspect of the current discussion which demands a keen contemplation is that, because teamwork brings about communication, contribution and compromising among students, leading to surmount mundane and seemingly formidable obstacles like assingment projects. While students cooperate with each other during communal projects, they simultaneously could disintegrate the whole work to different parts and each of them would undertake one fragment that is attractive and tantalizing to him or her, partition as well as collaboration. They also could perform assistance in eachother weakness since each individual sees materials differently and this collaboration definitely addresses novelty. Some scientists indicate that phenomena by saying this statement; ''one hand can't be heard". It means that a congregation of hands could accompany each other and be heared and obtain the most far fetched things. Just like hands a bunch of minds could create novelty and breakthrough as was elaborated.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that, a marked improvement can be achieved through a relaxed and calm environment. Group activities draw less pressure to get on student as their peers and they are at the same condition which is a relief. I recall that in individual projects I was overwhelmed with a lot of work which brings about a lot of perplexy for me and the worst thing was that my friends didnt answer my questions since we were rival and even they said a lot of lies about the rate of improvement in their projects. I felt disappointed and distress and couldn't concentrate on my work. As a matter of fact, I think working in a friendly-happily cooperation could induce your mind to tackle problems swiftly.
To sum up, based on the discussion and by taking all the aforementioned ideas into consideration it can easily uphold that group activities like project assignment are very beneficial for students as precipitate their learning process because they could help each other and secondly it provides a peaceful environment which makes students blossomed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | liviapabreu | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Shiimaaa | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | nusybah | 70 | view |
- TPO-32 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Educating children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site.Use specific reasons and examples t 85
- People learn things better from those at their own level-such as fellow students or co-workers- than from those at a higher level, such as teachers and supervisors.Do you agree or disagree with the above statement?Use specific reasons and examples to sup 76
- TPO-33 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 448, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...h rated efficiency in teaching process. whereas some are inclinded toward the opinion t...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 672, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ey should do their assignment solitary. Im for one, interested into the first grou...
^^
Line 1, column 729, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...ested into the first groupe and to some extend think that all job should be in this wa...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 774, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...mena by saying this statement; one hand cant be heard'. It means that a congreg...
^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...and the worst thing was that my friends didnt answer my questions since we were rival...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 582, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...s. I felt disappointed and distress and couldnt concentrate on my work. As a matter of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, i think, as a matter of fact, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2467.0 1977.66487455 125% => OK
No of words: 464.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31681034483 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03973680015 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 212.727598566 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577586206897 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.5123447325 48.9658058833 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.055555556 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180942261398 0.236089414692 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504088040931 0.076458572812 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044634477942 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113243470804 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0198265121086 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.