Nowadays, it is commonly accepted that todays because of advantage in managing the educational programs and the fitness of this plans with the availability of jobs in the most of developed or predevelopment societies, having a prediction for the possibility of success in future life are easier than it was in the past. Contrary, to this popular beliefs there are still those who argue that today because of presence of a lot of number of academic graduated people finding a good job are very harder than it was in the past and sometimes one job are more needed than others so the determining what type of jobs would be lead to a secure, successful in the future are very problematic. I, to a great extent, disagree with this idea that Today prediction of what kind of jobs lead to success is more difficult than it was in the past.
First and foremost, Thanks from social researchers and total programs managers in most of the governments.Today, the number of people who arrive at the universities are roughly parallel with job positions. For example, when I arrived at bachelor degree, the number of students was about 30 person in our field. But, in the present year, I know that the number of students that accepted in this field decreased to half.Because the managers subscribed that this decline is necessary to maintain the availability of job and labors. On the other hand, the number of students in the biology increased because of the same reason.
On another significant fact, that should be taken into the consideration is that Today, because of accessibility to a lot of job resources on the internet on other public networks. All of the members of society can explore about job condition in each region and several predicted information about the future change in the job condition. Therefore, young people through attention to this kind of information will be able to have better and more acquire choices about their special goals.
On the basis of reasons that mentioned above, I am convinced that now governments managing prepares more calm and secure condition to choose the future job for young people than past. Because of planning based on scientific approaches and availability of more information databases for people to make the correct decision about their favorite future job.
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 89
- TPO-47 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. 70
- TPO 40 60
- TOP-51 3
- In today's world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...educational programs and the fitness of this plans with the availability of jobs in ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Today
...ams managers in most of the governments.Today, the number of people who arrive at the...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 290, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...ee, the number of students was about 30 person in our field. But, in the present year,...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 418, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Because
...ccepted in this field decreased to half.Because the managers subscribed that this decli...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 181, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
... the internet on other public networks. All of the members of society can explore about jo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, therefore, for example, kind of, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 388.0 407.700716846 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94329896907 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43821085614 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83206027762 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 212.727598566 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492268041237 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 619.2 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.6003584229 58% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.1344086022 159% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.2193472085 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.833333333 100.406767564 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 20.6045352989 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.45110844103 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155310408656 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626383345294 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627243205438 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896565780471 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763398328983 0.0645574589148 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 11.7677419355 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.1575268817 156% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 29.0 10.002688172 290% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.0537634409 147% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.