Some people believe that interrupting and correcting a mistake right away would disturb both the classroom discipline and the teacher's plan. Nevertheless, in my opinion, this option would be the best solution since, it shows passion and enthusiasm of listeners, makes an interaction during the class, and avoids to make further errors.
Correcting the mistake right away is a sign of passion and enthusiasm of listeners to the lecture. When a teacher or meeting leader sees how students listen to his speech carefully, he receives a good feedback of his work and a vibrant atmosphere will be creates in the class. Teachers have more tendency to transfer their information to students because, they are listening eagerly.
In addition, immediate interruption and correction makes a positive interaction between teachers and students in which both of them are able to share their knowledge, experience and thought with each other. In other word, it makes the class to be more dynamic and students have a chance to express themselves and make an argument over something.
Moreover, by correcting mistakes immediately, further errors will be avoided. Sometimes, even an small mistake can cause a mass misunderstanding between students, which may create a big problem for them in the future. Thus, immediate interruption is the best approach to prevent more errors in the future.
In conclusion, although many people believe that interruption and correction a mistake while the teacher is speaking may make him confuse, I think that it would be the best approach, because it is a sign of passion and enthusiasm of listeners to what the speaker is saying. Also, in this way a positive interaction will be made between teachers and students in order to share their knowledge. Besides, the teacher will notice about his error and prevent to repeat it furthermore.
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task In recent years, many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment. These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Leadership comes naturally: one cannot learn to be a leader.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO-45 - Integrated Writing Task Any student of paleontology will be struck by the fact that a great many animals of the past were considerably larger than they are today. This holds true for species ranging from dinosaurs to most mammals. Just why they w 3
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 80
- TPO-41 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver, by correcting mistakes immediately, further errors will be avoided. Sometime...
^^
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...errors will be avoided. Sometimes, even an small mistake can cause a mass misunder...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 43.0788530466 56% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1560.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91718281147 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 212.727598566 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9665847928 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 5.45110844103 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171957613414 0.236089414692 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070565871206 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547762740038 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102980360164 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310653504701 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.