TPO-49 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendships with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends

persons have an inner feature which is that they want to have communication with others.in the past these communications were so simple and trust waves among of members but today personal aim is more important than other things, therefore, it isn't easy to gain a real friendship.in my view I think that because of today's situation it's better to keep longtime friends instead of trying to increase the number of friends.it will be rendered below:

First and foremost is that, in the longtime friendship, there is a deep diagnosis and members are understanding each other more than a new one. for instance, last year I lost my grandfather and I was in a bad situation my old friend came to my home and tried to calm me. they did it as well as the could do. the know me well and familiar with how could calm me and give me calmness. my old friend is only two and I have lots of new friends who I know them during my work time but they don't have enough cognition as older one have and how valuable than this could be in a relationship.

Second, the base of each friendship is trust and as I said at the first most of the friendship is based on the specific aim while in the past friendship didn't have such this meaning.new friends might be great in the face but in fact, they don't do what the show and it may take a lot of time to understand are they reliable or not.for example, I found lots of friend in my work environment but I can't trust them completely and sometimes I cast doubt are they really friends or not. although I don't keep away from them, however, don't effort to make a consist friendship with them unless after 10 years when they might become one of my old friends who we can have trust on each other.

to summarize, old friendship is more valuable than a new one even this member group consisting of only one old friend but a real friend.

Votes
Average: 6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Persons
persons have an inner feature which is that the...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ortant than other things, therefore, it isnt easy to gain a real friendship.in my vi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
..., there is a deep diagnosis and members are understanding each other more than a new one. for ins...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...tanding each other more than a new one. for instance, last year I lost my grandfath...
^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e. they did it as well as the could do. the know me well and familiar with how could cal...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...how could calm me and give me calmness. my old friend is only two and I have lots ...
^^
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... know them during my work time but they dont have enough cognition as older one have...
^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ecific aim while in the past friendship didnt have such this meaning.new friends migh...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... be great in the face but in fact, they dont do what the show and it may take a lot ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 352, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun friend seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of friends'.
Suggestion: lots of friends
...ey reliable or not.for example, I found lots of friend in my work environment but I cant trust...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... of friend in my work environment but I cant trust them completely and sometimes I c...
^^^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...t doubt are they really friends or not. although I dont keep away from them, however, do...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 493, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... they really friends or not. although I dont keep away from them, however, dont effo...
^^^^
Line 5, column 528, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...gh I dont keep away from them, however, dont effort to make a consist friendship wit...
^^^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...from them, however, dont effort to make a consist friendship with them unless after 10 ye...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...who we can have trust on each other. to summarize, old friendship is more valua...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, really, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in fact, as well as, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 52.1666666667 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.35057471264 4.8611393121 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50128121483 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51724137931 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.51630824373 86% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.6003584229 39% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 43.0 20.1344086022 214% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 186.046323197 48.9658058833 380% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.25 100.406767564 188% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.5 20.6045352989 211% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 17.625 5.45110844103 323% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 5.5376344086 289% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157520095085 0.236089414692 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731783998943 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309446249433 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105247624472 0.150856017488 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107190317625 0.0645574589148 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 11.7677419355 177% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.1575268817 162% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.84 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 86.8835125448 51% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 10.002688172 540% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.2 10.0537634409 191% => OK
text_standard: 54.0 10.247311828 527% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.