On the whole, it is of a little doubt, if any, societies' expectation is an issue of great importance and consideration. The rules forming that expectation can affect both our quality of life and the level of performance in daily tasks. Consequently, the relationship between these rules and young people has priority. In this regard, today, some people wonder whether the rules the societies expect young people to obey are too rigid. I disagree with the provided statement and believe young people are not strained by rules. In the ensuing lines, I will provide two reasons for the collaboration with this thesis.
A first idea worthy of consideration is that in the modern era, the number of organizations defending human rights, including youth, increased significantly. Simple surfing on the internet indicates that there are several associations in every society that defend a variety of human rights such as homosexual rights. Both governmental and independent organizations try to provide democracy for every group of society such as the young generation. If rules are established against young people right, it will immediately face a lot of controversies. For example, imagine a young man wanted to found an office to start working as a professional. Therefore, he has to attain some approval from several departments of government. If there might be an irrational restricting rule, he can readily post on Twitter or Instagram and inform his circle of friends. Gradually, with sharing the post, mentioned associations become aware and start to argue with that rule in news. As a result, the rule will eliminate and the young man can continue establishing his office. This indicates that in the modern era, young people have a simple way against rules which restrict them.
The second noticeable reason is that today, by expanding access to information, the young generation have more option in doing stuff, hence young people can treat freely rather than in past years. Today is a world of diversity and there is no one fixed path for achieving goals. In other words, each young individual is unique due to his or her gender, sexual orientation, socio-economic status, age, physical abilities, religious beliefs, political beliefs, or other ideologies. Therefore, the more diversity in their way of thinking, the fewer rules to expect them to obey. My opinion on this matter has profoundly influenced by my own experience. When I was a sophomore student, I was working on an architectural project. For finishing that, I needed to access an ancient building plan. I remember, due to restricting rules for photography from that building, I should pass a long process to gain approval for taking photos. However, I choose a different way, I used the google map as an alternative solution. Finally, I got all information I needed without any trouble. This clearly shows that in the modern era, young people can’t be limited.
By and large, based on the aforementioned arguments, I think the rules that societies today expect young people to follow are not too rigid due to the availability of organizations defending human rights and diversity of option in doing stuff.
- Some parent offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree Nowadays it is not important for people to have regular family meals together 73
- TPO 51 integrated 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The environmental issue is too complex to be handled by the individual 83
- TPO 39 - Independent taskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, as to, for example, i think, such as, as a result, by and large, in other words, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 52.1666666667 123% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2662.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.138996139 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98308964163 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 212.727598566 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528957528958 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 843.3 618.680645161 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3336015167 48.9658058833 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0714285714 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.6045352989 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262604483469 0.236089414692 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662499717665 0.076458572812 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701498902774 0.0737576698707 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188888846255 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755499275558 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 86.8835125448 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.