TPO-53
In this progressive and sophisticated world, governments are requested to pay more contribute to improve public facilities such as Internet access. While some people are inclined towards this idea that governments are anticipated to invest more money in improving public transportation, others, on the other hand, are against this point of view. As far as I concerned, my own opinion is that governments have to increase the investment on public transportation. In the following essay, I will delve into examples and reasons supporting my viewpoints.
The first noteworthy reason coming to my mind is that governments care about reducing their citizens traveling time, and improving public transportation helps governments to solve this issue. Nowadays, people want to put less effort on waiting in the traffic crowd. As a result, improving public transportation prevent people to stuck in the situation. For instance, my country, which has a well public transportation system, allows me do not have to worry about the car accident will impact the way to go to work. Because I have a lot of ways to go to my company such as taking train, riding rental bicycle or taking bus.
The second compelling reason from my viewpoint is that people want to save money, and investing more money in the public transportation provides governments an opportunity to help their citizens to save money. Many people is hard to save money because of the high inflation. Therefore, improving the transportation cause people do not have purchase the car since good transportation has been constructed. Take my friend as an example. He had to work in the neighbor city but he did not have enough money to buy a car. However, governments offer program that anyone who traveling to the near city had a discount on the public transportation. Consequently, he decided not to buy the car and saved the money.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it is crystal clear that governments require to invest more money and effort on improving public transportation. Since that improving public transportation helps governments make citizen's traveling more efficient and allows the citizens saving more money.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-22 | lutzuming | 3 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | firataydogdu | 76 | view |
| 2021-07-27 | vida00 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-14 | m.ramezanii1987@gmail.com | 3 | view |
| 2021-03-27 | majid.fazlollahi | 83 | view |
- TPO 53 Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a numbe 86
- TPO 23 55
- 2021 1 10 Companies Some people think that if companies prohibit sending emails to staff on weekend or during other time out of office hours Staff s dissatisfactions with their companies will decrease Others think this will not reduce the overall dissatis 3
- TPO 40 60
- TPO 47 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'investing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: investing
... crystal clear that governments require to invest more money and effort on improving publ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nce that improving public transportation helps governments make citizens travelin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, second, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1845.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 354.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21186440678 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12172455941 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497175141243 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6311083251 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.5 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.