It’s hard to deny that arts enrich our spiritual world, and such a fact may mislead impressionable people to generate the opinion that our government should spent more on arts instead of athletics. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies, and it should be examined meticulously. I strongly hold that our government should allocate resources equally between athletics and arts.
First of all, arts pass on previous skills and spiritual treasures generation by generation to form a unique culture. To illustrate, The Louvre in Paris, one of the most famous museums in this world, is keeping plenty of mysterious and interesting holdings, such as Venus and Mona Lisa. Even now, these cultural relics unremittingly induce various imagination, which produce uncountable books and movies. These works record the history facts as well as the current events, representing the existence of humans.
However, the great importance of arts doesn’t mean that athletics should be ignored. Promoting physical activities helps everyone exercise more and enjoy a healthier life. Nothing can be done without a fit body. What’s more, people who exercise regularly live a self-regulated life, which improves their working and studying efficiency. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was a freshman in the university, I seldom went to the playground and spent all time learning, but things didn’t develop as I expected, for I didn’t perform well in my classes. Then I realized that it was time to change. Exercising gradually became part of my life. I lived a more balanced life and my academic performance had also improved a lot. This example vividly demonstrates how important the athletics can be for ordinary people.
In conclusion, governments should spend equal money in supporting athletics and arts. Athletics stand for our physical strength and arts stand for our mental strength. Only with both of them can we live a better life.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Today students are more interested in politics than they were in the past 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 90
- TPO 54 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 52.1666666667 54% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 317.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28075709779 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9023556402 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621451104101 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7641318468 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.7 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.85 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.45110844103 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161891464614 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461721140784 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0664297557773 0.0737576698707 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100648061413 0.150856017488 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617088838985 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 11.7677419355 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.