TPO22-Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom (not mine)
In the past few year, the issue of whether or not teachers should share their social and political views with their students in the classrooms has received a great deal of attention from teachers and educational experts. Although some may say that teachers could help students to better understand the social and political situation of their country by making their points of view known to the students; I as the same as many others, believe that due to the different effects of this discussions on students, teachers should not talk about them in their classes.
First of all, an important reason why teachers should not share their social and political beliefs with their students is that it may have effects on student’s attitude toward their teacher. Most of the student especially in high schools, collage and universities have their own ideas about social and political issues, and some of them may be in the opposite view with their teachers. So, talking about social and political beliefs in the classes may contribute to argument between teachers and students, or have effect on the student’s attitude toward their teacher. Many experts mention that these kins of problems may influence students' education badly.
Another reason for this idea is that talking about political and social phenomena in the class may waste student’s time. Social and political issues should just be contributed with students in the classes of these majors. For example, math and biology teachers should not talk about them in their classes. Furthermore, if social and political issues was in the curriculum of any classes, the teacher should just teach fundamental aspects and, he or she must not support or reject any particular point of view.
Finally, it is occasionally said that teachers should not make their beliefs known to their students because students may have unfair judgment about that issue. When teachers advocate a specific point of view about social or political problems in their classes, as they are the main speaker in the class, and there is not anybody to talk in opposite of them, their opinion would look perfect. Thus, students may judge unfairly about these problems.
In conclusion, considering the ideas presented in the paragraphs above, I personally believe that teachers should not make their social or political beliefs known to their students in the classroom chiefly due to psychological and political reasons.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | farbdabbasi | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-24 | paras2 | 73 | view |
- TPO 29-Edmontpsaurus migration 81
- TPO17- decreasing the birds population 80
- TPO33-Application of ancient stone balls 80
- TPO41-Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays 70
- TPO 18-Do you agree or disagree? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun year seems to be countable; consider using: 'few years'.
Suggestion: few years
In the past few year, the issue of whether or not teachers s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
In the past few year, the issue of whether or not teachers should share their social and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ve that due to the different effects of this discussions on students, teachers shoul...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, talking about, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23544303797 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6398885159 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448101265823 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.1344086022 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.9472263309 48.9658058833 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.714285714 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2142857143 20.6045352989 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.522998843484 0.236089414692 222% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231495417848 0.076458572812 303% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118491690916 0.0737576698707 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.379807771316 0.150856017488 252% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743655812871 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 11.7677419355 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 58.1214874552 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.0537634409 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.