TPO41-Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays
Over the past few decades, the issue of whether teacher receive less attention by society than previous has received a great deal of attention from sociologists and people. Although some may argue that today societies's priatories have been changed, I as well as many others believe that the evolution of the people's either on culture or education level has caused the more attention on teachers on recent decades.
First and foremost, a paramount reason why on these days teacher receive more value by society than the past is that the awareness of the people and communities has been increased. In the past, most of the people were virtually uneducated; therefore, they would not aware about the significance of the education and teachers as well. In addition, in this competitive world for having a appropriate occupation people should be educated more than the past. As a result, the teachers' position has been augmented through the past decades. For the purpose of the illustration, I have a aunt who is a teacher in second-grade school. She has a high salary and the parents, all the time, are in touch with her and respect him as much as they can due to the reason that they perceive she is very influential on their children's success.
A further reason for this view is that the culture of the communities has been distincted throughout recent decades. In these days, people are more educated and are well-known about the sociologies rules. This means that not only are they respecting to the teachers but also they appreciate them more than the past due to the reason that they understand the important situation of the teachers on their life. In addition, the societies persuade more of the people to become teacher due to the fact that their successes are dependent on a well-education community. For instance, in my country the government allocated more adavantages on teacher job to encourage the youth to select this job.
In brief, contemplating all aforementioned reasons, I can draw the conclusion that today the value of the teachers has been increased in societies chiefly due to the augmentation of the people's education and the develpment of the culture.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-06-14 | Vivian Chang | 73 | view |
2023-03-26 | Crash | 73 | view |
2023-02-25 | can111 | 60 | view |
2023-02-14 | reza_fattahi | 70 | view |
2023-01-06 | minammah | 73 | view |
- TPO30-‘burning mirror’ 73
- Buzzing strategy in marketing 83
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities (not mine) 73
- Today more and more people tend to live on their own 78
- Do you agree or disagree?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...remost, a paramount reason why on these days teacher receive more value by society t...
^^^^
Line 3, column 385, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...n, in this competitive world for having a appropriate occupation people should be...
^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...the purpose of the illustration, I have a aunt who is a teacher in second-grade s...
^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... chiefly due to the augmentation of the peoples education and the develpment of the cul...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, in brief, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1821.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98904109589 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84249183022 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479452054795 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6123699775 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.071428571 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0714285714 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 5.45110844103 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354161416748 0.236089414692 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125013035254 0.076458572812 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886663304088 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209610708937 0.150856017488 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852029352469 0.0645574589148 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 11.7677419355 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.