TPO55 Independent
Expanding the skill of team working collaboration in the students has always been a fundamental aim of teaching for educators. To make this goal practically learned, teachers and professors design some group assignment projects for students which can be done either with communication in person or online. Some people believe that a better result can be achieved when classmates get in touch in person rather than by e-mails. I absolutely agree with this statement for various reasons, two of which I'm going to elaborate upon to substantiate my viewpoint in the following essay.
To begin with, let's talk about how easier it is to share new conceptions and suggestions in person rather than via email. While one of the cardinal principles to complete a project is to contemplate the ideas, analyze each one in the group, choose the best practical ones and finally make a conclusion of them, it is easier to debate about some rejected ones by giving details and more information when everyone gathered in an office. Sometimes by talking online, our accent in conjunction with our real meaning can not be understood via emails. For example, me and two of my friends in the first year of university were supposed to give an assignment about the environmental effect on body fats considering that our major was exercise physiology. One of my friends suggested using a method which based on my vast research was not really helpful. Because of the Pandemic, we were far away and our group on Whatsapp app was the way of communication. when I rejected her idea, she immediately became angry and sad, showed her feeling by leaving the group, and didn't even give me a chance to support my rejection by scientific reasons. She believed that I have personal problems with her and that was the reason we got into a chaotic situation by the end of the project. Accordingly, this way of communication makes some people misunderstand how we talk and it is hard to handle this kind of problem.
What is more, I would say that communicating by email is time taking if not every person in the group feel the same level of responsibility. One of the ways that a project can be done is the cooperation of everyone to provide data around the title and summarize them as fast as possible to start the practical part. When a member doesn't care and stops answering emails quickly, other members lose their access to that person but considering the class, they are compelled to make that person contribute to the project and it's not possible to leave her alone. For instance, in my own experience, One of the members of our assignment group stopped answering us neither by email nor on phone calls and we had limited time to make the results ready. We completed the process ignoring her presence, but the professor gave a negative point to other members of the group due to the absence of that person. Based on these details, I believe being there in person is a better force for everyone to do their duties as a member and get the results earlier.
All in all, if we concentrate all of these factors together, we can easily conclude that meeting in person can help us by providing better work, neither late nor poor in its concepts by communicating in person. As it is possible to take part in person for a project, why we should decide to suffer from the far communicating problems?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-27 | Fateme_mhd | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ement for various reasons, two of which Im going to elaborate upon to substantiate...
^^
Line 2, column 949, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...tsapp app was the way of communication. when I rejected her idea, she immediately be...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1058, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...d her feeling by leaving the group, and didnt even give me a chance to support my rej...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...start the practical part. When a member doesnt care and stops answering emails quickly...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, finally, first, if, really, so, while, for example, for instance, kind of, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 43.0788530466 144% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 92.0 52.1666666667 176% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2778.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 587.0 407.700716846 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73253833049 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9222030514 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75415748988 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 300.0 212.727598566 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511073253833 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 889.2 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.4534539988 48.9658058833 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 100.406767564 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9523809524 20.6045352989 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 11.7677419355 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 86.8835125448 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.