There are many things and objects in our life that could not be given up once they become a part of our lives. Our history is rife with such examples and one inevitable example would be a ‘car’. A car is universally personified as a symbol of freedom and development. It came in our live and changed our whole perspective towards the world .It is not a mere commodity used to travel across cities but a tool that led to our current economic and financial stability. I disagree with this argument and believe that there would be much more cars on the roads twenty years from now. To abet my stand I would like to discuss some specific reasons and examples in the following paragraphs.
Firstly technology is still developing by leaps and bounds and these developments are directly or indirectly affecting our cars. Generally a complete overhaul and implementation of any new design takes at least a decade and with newer technologies such as self-driving cars still under development we are still to see a revolution in cars. These cars would be much safer, efficient and cheaper than our present cars. For instance, these autonomous cars would be able to transport us to our destination autonomously without any human intervention at just the click of a button. On contrary due to human intervention our current cars are prone to accidents and it is known that car accidents are a major factor in total number of deaths worldwide. Thus these technological advancements would make driving much safer.
Secondly we are currently facing some serious environmental issues such as Global warming because of our reckless burning of fossil fuels which is a nonrenewable resource. With the advent of new technologies for energy production such as solar power, Fuel cells and hybrid which are capable of sustainable development, cars are still to adapt to these newer technologies which would enable to us to counteract current environmental crisis with compromising our needs. Additionally, electric cars are proving to be much more efficient and powerful than our conventional gasoline cars. For instance companies such as Tesla is a pioneer in making electric cars which are not only more powerful and requires no gasoline to run .Keeping in view these technologies there would be much more cars in twenty years from now because newer developments are still being made .
In the light of the aforementioned reasons it seems axiomatic that there would be much more cars in twenty years from now. The whole credit goes to the recent developments in technology and science.
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment-doing things they like to do-rather than doing things they should do. 50
- In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. 73
- TPO-02 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: It is easier for people to get educated nowadays than in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...les and one inevitable example would be a 'car'. A car is universally p...
^
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... our whole perspective towards the world .It is not a mere commodity used to trave...
^^
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ur whole perspective towards the world .It is not a mere commodity used to travel ...
^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this car' or 'These cars'?
Suggestion: This car; These cars
... are still to see a revolution in cars. These car would be much safer, efficient and chea...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 746, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...or in total number of deaths worldwide. Thus these technological advancements would ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 723, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...powerful and requires no gasoline to run .Keeping in view these technologies there...
^^
Line 5, column 725, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Keeping
...werful and requires no gasoline to run .Keeping in view these technologies there would ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 862, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... newer developments are still being made . In the light of the aforementioned r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, at least, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2155.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 428.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03504672897 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95339191193 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511682242991 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 686.7 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8875772776 48.9658058833 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.722222222 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205581766814 0.236089414692 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07764924009 0.076458572812 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758199458516 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147357825875 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233358642953 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.