Universities should require every graduating student to take public speaking
courses
In the modern-day, education plays a prominent role in all societies. Owing to its paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching for ways to enhance educational systems. A controversial question which deserves some words here is whether or not universities should include public speaking courses as obligatory for graduate students. I assert that public discussion courses should become compulsory for students. In what follows, the most clear-cut reasons will be discussed.
The first argumentative factor to take into account is that students learn some social skills by selecting public speaking courses. To shed more light on this matter, students will become an important person, such as an engineer, a doctor, a professor and many other similar ones in the future; hence, they need to know how to speak fluently to their employees, or other individuals who have bond with them. As a result, in the public speaking course, when students force to present a lecture and speak about various topics, they prepare for the future professions effectively; consequently, they attain sufficient abilities to speak about their notions and ideas clearly. Furthermore, it has remarkable influences to enhance the level of self-confidence among them. Consider a chemical engineer student who has a high level of knowledge in her major, for instance. She must have enough skills for speaking about her ideas in a workspace. If she cannot speak impressively or transfer her ideas effectively, she would not become progressive in her professional situations. Furthermore, her bosses will not be very enthusiastic to get some projects with this engineer, and she may become disappointed as a result of this event.
Another equally significant point is that students learn to defend their ideas when they take public speaking courses. To elaborate on this point, students will face many different ideas and notions in their future job or career. In this situation, they must know how to defend their ideas and how to respect other’s opinions. By taking public discussion courses, students become flexible to the ideas which become the opposite side of their notion; thus, this phenomenon assists them remarkably in their future jobs since numerous opinions exist for each topic, and individuals who can tolerate the contrasting ideas will become successful.
Taking all aforementioned reasons and examples into account, we may draw the conclusion that if students take public speaking courses, they can gain many advantageous. This issue is as a result of this importance that they not only learn social skills but also learn how they must defend their ideas.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ies. Owing to its paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...stion which deserves some words here is whether or not universities should include public spea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'bonded'.
Suggestion: bonded
...mployees, or other individuals who have bond with them. As a result, in the public s...
^^^^
Line 4, column 473, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'presenting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: presenting
...ic speaking course, when students force to present a lecture and speak about various topic...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...orate on this point, students will face many different ideas and notions in their future job o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, thus, for instance, speaking about, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37825059102 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86812774188 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517730496454 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.6846080447 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.736842105 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2631578947 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241087268128 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811313646588 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906416971571 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151394671676 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348910938591 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ies. Owing to its paramount importance, a large number of scientists have always been searching f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...stion which deserves some words here is whether or not universities should include public spea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'bonded'.
Suggestion: bonded
...mployees, or other individuals who have bond with them. As a result, in the public s...
^^^^
Line 4, column 473, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'presenting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: presenting
...ic speaking course, when students force to present a lecture and speak about various topic...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...orate on this point, students will face many different ideas and notions in their future job o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, so, thus, for instance, speaking about, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 423.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37825059102 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86812774188 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517730496454 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.6846080447 48.9658058833 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.736842105 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2631578947 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241087268128 0.236089414692 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811313646588 0.076458572812 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906416971571 0.0737576698707 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151394671676 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348910938591 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 10.9000537634 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 86.8835125448 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.