When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success. Do you agree or disagree?
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that human beings bend over backwards to reach success through hard-working attitude. Indeed, it makes people decide their path and progress day in day out. Stemming from this fact a relevant question that is a moot point is whether luck has something to do with success. Due to controversial nature of this question there is not a general agreement on this issue. I am, however, to a great extent of the conviction that luck might not be reliable and it enhance the likelihood of being unsuccessful in near future. In ensuing paragraphs some convincing reasons will be delineated to elaborate my personal stance.
To commence with, success is one of utmost critical importance life goals for every mature human along with trials and tribulations in everyday life. Generally phrased, there are variety of ways, which could resulted in success like as hard-working, sound decisions, think wisely and so forth, but take luck into consideration would be risky and it could not guarantee future success. For example, luck does not lie in the picture, if luck is to be considered, no one would work but just wait till their luck shines up. To elucidate more on this issue, a plethora of people have experienced success through hard working without take luck into account. In fact, luck might have deleterious effects on people's life and influence it negatively to the extent that people never reach pinnacle of their lives.
Another reason that should not go unnoticed is that think about success through hard working attitude without luck not only will make people responsible but also will improve their self-confidence. To put it in general word, if people think of luck as a tool, they will never take the responsibility of their acts and never carry out their works meticulously. Going into the depth, although luck may provide an opportunity for people to be successful in some case, it could not be accurate and reliable. However, what was alluded to above can't be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alongside with the countless merits it has, indisputably, luck will facilitate success owing to the fact that it depends on environment and surrounding. For example, vast majorities of people born in wealthy family so, they will not run into a huge problem because of a hoard of money. Nonetheless, it does not make those preceding benefits pale.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that luck could not guarantee people success and may have impact people's lives negatively. Indeed, hard-working attitude will provide fertile ground for people to experience success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-10 | khosrow nouroozi | 66 | view |
| 2016-12-31 | amirbahman | 78 | view |
| 2016-08-15 | amirbahman | 70 | view |
| 2014-10-26 | mahsa.parsapour | 80 | view |
- It is better to be a member of a group than to be the leader of a group. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- The goal of politics should not be the pursuit of an ideal, but rather the search for common ground and reasonable consensus. 62
- Learn by doing or reading or listening. Which do you prefer? Why? 70
- In the past, it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to secure, successful future. Do you agree or disagree? 90
- tpo 49 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 501, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enhances'?
Suggestion: enhances
... that luck might not be reliable and it enhance the likelihood of being unsuccessful in...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ble. However, what was alluded to above cant be overgeneralized to all contexts. Alo...
^^^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...round for people to experience success.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, for example, in fact, in general, by and large, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 9.8082437276 184% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 52.1666666667 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2199.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09027777778 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8118273849 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2265387827 48.9658058833 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.95 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275300140277 0.236089414692 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849260516779 0.076458572812 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586085796983 0.0737576698707 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184335076919 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262025436417 0.0645574589148 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.