“When people succeed, it is because of hard work. Luck has nothing to do with success.” Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above? Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position.
Success and failure are two sides of a coin where success is the result of hard work. I totally agree with the statement because hard work is a measurable quantity whereas luck does not have any measure. There are several examples which strengthen my position.
Moreover, failure and success can prove on the basis of work done by a person. For example, to score A grade a student studies for 3 hours daily and another student studies 3 hours before day of examination and the first student who studies daily gets A grade. In both the cases the number of hours gives measure of hard work done by the first student. There is no such indication which proves that luck is important to get success.
Furthermore, there are so many success stories of famous people and every story tells about how hard work they did to achieve success in life. The Missile man of India Dr APJ Abdul Kalam belongs to a small village and his delicateness made him a renowned scientist and former president of India. Isaac Newton, Galileo, Maxwell, Kalpna Chawla and many more famous people’s tales show paragons of hard work.
However, some people argue that with hard work luck is equally important as Indian cricket player Sachin Tendulkar out on 99 runs and missed his century but it is not true because if he can make 99 runs then he can score one last also but he missed may be because of nervousness. There are different aspects such as nervousness, overconfidence, lack of consciousness, or maybe he did not practice a particular type of ball which out him. There is no strong point which shows it happened because of bad luck.
Finally, we can not blame imaginary things for our failure and luck is also an imaginary aspect to defend self respect. Aforementioned examples prove that people get success because of hard work, not luck.
- The following appeared as a recommendation by a committee planning a ten-year budget for the city of Calatrava."The birthrate in our city is declining: in fact, last year's birthrate was only one-half that of five years ago. Thus the number of s 23
- Choose one of the following transportation vehicles and explain why you think it has changed people s lives automobiles b bicycles b airplanes Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagre 66
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian, a company that manufactures men's clothing."Five years ago, at a time when we had difficulties in obtaining reliable supplier of high-quality wool fabric, we discontinued 59
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss the e 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...success because of hard work, not luck.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, well, whereas, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1977.66487455 77% => OK
No of words: 319.0 407.700716846 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74294670846 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.48103885553 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52131565952 2.67179642975 94% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576802507837 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 618.680645161 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0169266883 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.866666667 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 5.45110844103 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219190794442 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823921763697 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742916541095 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131732754904 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594042786671 0.0645574589148 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.