When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.

By and large, schools play a vital role in every society in order to prime students for their future life. In this regard, homeworks and school projects are very indispensable for students owing to the fact that by doing them, they can review all the textbook materials in order to get a good grade in their exams and learn academic subjects better for their future. How should projects be assigned to students by their teachers is a subject of controversy. A popular belief in this regard is that teachers must encourage students to do their projects with each other as a team owing to the fact that they learn more effectively, whereas others believe that students should work alone on their assignments. Personally, I agree with the former. In the following lines, I will attempt to substantiate this idea through 2 reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that there is a lot of interaction between students in a group study. Students can solve their problems better when they are doing their homeworks together. Sometimes, textbook materials are very hard or vague and it would be very difficult for students to understand them. So, if students want to do their projects and assignments by themselves, they might encounter a plethora of problems. One advantage of doing projects in a group study is that students can use other's experiences to solve their problems. A group study provide a good situation for students to share their thoughts and ideas regarding a specific subject and talk about their problems with each other. They can have a lot of interaction with each other. Through these conversations, students will find that how other students think about that subject or problem and as a result, by using other's experiences, they can overcome their issues. Thus, by doing projects together, the learning process would be more effectively.
The second reason which deserves some words here is that working together can facilitate the way that projects will be done. In a group study, tasks are identified. Sometimes, teachers assign projects to students, which are very hard to do and demands a lot of time. Students have to do a lot of research owing to the fact that these assignments are very complicated and thus, it would be very difficult to do them on time. However, when students decide to do their projects together, everyone is responsible for doing some of it. For example, one or two students are responsible for doing the introduction part, while others are doing research in order to write the body paragraphs and the conclusion section. So, doing projects would be more easier for students and they can do them on time.
To put it all in a nutshell, teachers should encourage students to do their projects together in a group study owing to the fact that, they can have a lot of interaction with other students and use their experiences in order to solve their problems. Also, team working enables students to do their projects much faster and easier. Thus, I suggest that schools require students to do their assignments and projects together as a team, because they can do their homeworks more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on them.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Independent TOEFL Writing
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 739, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...on section. So, doing projects would be more easier for students and they can do them on ti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they are asked to work alone on them.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, as a result, by and large

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2663.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 543.0 407.700716846 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90423572744 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.48103885553 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67119437971 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.379373848987 0.524837075471 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 797.4 618.680645161 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9621045479 48.9658058833 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.52 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.72 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36 5.45110844103 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319261080458 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11313762285 0.076458572812 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860660708225 0.0737576698707 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235927397865 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517956706715 0.0645574589148 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 11.7677419355 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.