When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.
To begin with, working together can provide students opportunities to improve their studying efficiency. In a group, the team members are always classmates or friends. In order for self-esteem or winning favor of teachers, there are more likely for students to compete with each other. No one wants to lag behind. By contrast, compared with group working, working alone may can study in one’s own step but it may not stimulate students to work harder. Take me as an example. Once my friends and I designed a project for the library which demanded one week to finish, our teacher would grade higher for the one who achieved better. Through teamwork, I realized that my friends were more adept at drawing and designing and the inability and strong feeling of competition made me feel that I should work harder than before. As a result, there was more impetus for me to stay up late to find new information and images for the project, focusing more on details and seeking innovative ideas, which proved to be a big success for my final grade. It is a great chance for students to learn how to achieve maximism of study speed and well-organize their time among group work.
In addition to enhancing studying speed, it is possible for students to have capability improved during a discussion with classmates. That is, because for different people, the same topic may arouse different opinions and thoughts. Unlike studying alone, group work provokes various ideas. By exchanging with others, students realize their strengths or weaknesses. My professor is a good example to illustrate. Without pointing out our drawbacks directly, every time she organized a group discussion or debate in order that we could exchange our works ahead of time. It is an imperative step because by intensely kicking something around and looking from different angles, it is easier for us to aware of which part is need to be improved and what we have learnt from others in terms of the same topic. Meanwhile, owing to strong discussions and high involvements, we could remember impressively about contents we have summarized, which benefits for our future study. That is magic that group working brings about.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-21 | Zmx_109 | 88 | view |
| 2023-05-05 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 70 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | nikki07hung | 66 | view |
- Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now 95
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 76
- Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, may, so, well, while, in addition, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 366.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00546448087 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6769947469 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603825136612 0.524837075471 115% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4102502565 48.9658058833 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4210526316 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2631578947 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.53405017921 44% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186146680196 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057716063436 0.076458572812 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490944942755 0.0737576698707 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147031865057 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569460739499 0.0645574589148 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.