Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
The jobs in modern society have witnessed a boom in productivity among people. Delighted with an ample supply of learning opportunities, people also are in a dilemma whether doing "many" or "few" jobs. Some people are in favor of the former, saying various things could enrich working experience while others support the latter due to the difficulty of get higher quality. From my point of view, I would show my preference for the latter.
To begin with, doing so many things could harm people's health and bring about a sense of failure. To some extent, for a person, it is impossible for him or her to do various things without adequate time because so many tasks may take double even triple time than focusing on one or two. That is to say, there is no enough sleeping and leisure time owing to working would occupy the period that belongs to recreation and rest, which is advantageous to mental and physical health for at least 8 hours for sleeping each day can support the effective work of a person. Take me as an example. Once occupied with graduation businesses, struggling between dissertation, ceremony planning, and job preparation, along with a burning desire to well-organize everything, I splited the day into several parts, squeezed time to discuss even worked until deep into night. Busy and bustling like a bee. Needless to say, fever come to me because of lack of sleeping as well as I also made trifle mistakes in details causing conflicts among professor，classmates and employers. As a result, I finished the tasks one by one rather than doing them at the meantime, which releases me from heavy pressure, builds a feeling of goal and receives a self-recognition with sufficient time and energy.
In addition, the number of tasks that people cope with plays an important role in improving working efficiency. The more the tasks are, the less chances that the attention could be focus are. It is elaborated by the fact that if people perform numerous things at the same time, it is hard for them to concentrate on and come up innovative idea as all things are different in sources interrupting each other. Seldom do I can solve math, biology, physics and literature problems at the same time because there is no similarity between them, leaving the result that the speed of my learning is dragged not mention to rendering solutions. By contrast, without teemed with uncertainty for many tasks, one could have deeper comprehension in a task bringing about a fresh thought for the topic.
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects. 76
- Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now 95
- Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 81
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...efficiency. The more the tasks are, the less chances that the attention could be foc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, while, at least, in addition, as a result, as well as, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94379391101 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90095596741 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.4630313008 48.9658058833 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.176470588 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1176470588 20.6045352989 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 5.45110844103 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.53405017921 66% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214477852245 0.236089414692 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628905805253 0.076458572812 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680673940485 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139924129314 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025294703349 0.0645574589148 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.