Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay: an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun?
When it comes to finding a job with same payment, is an interesting and challenging job with less break better or a job with more vacation but less fun have more advantages? Although some believe the later stands as the priority choice, it is the former contributes greater benefits for people.
It is so argued that having more vacation may make workers happy even the job itself is boring. Because, nowadays, people are more and more focus on their social life, and this work allows people to have more time to play, make friends, or take rest. Supporters of this argument must be reminded that, in practicality, when people older certain age, the time they spend on social life become less. People are more likely to concentrate on accomplishment of their jobs. If the work has less challenge, they may feel boring and unhappy. By contrast, when people get older, they will enjoy they have a interesting work. For example, world famous president such as Boris Johnson or Donald Trump have a great social life when they were young, however, when they grew up, they care more about their challenging job, and they are enjoy in it.
Another disadvantage of taking less fun job is that as time go by, people may feel tired about their work owing to lacking interest. Besides, people may probably do not want to learn more knowledge by virtue of lacking challenge. It may let workers do not want to stay in this company for long term and have less opportunity to get promoted. By comparison, while people are doing something they truly love, they may feel glad about it, and even if it takes lots of time, people will unaware about it. Moreover, people will want to learn more new information about their jobs and willing to stay longer. Thus, it is more likely to be promoted.
So beneficial is having a more interesting job with less vacation that it must be taken into more consideration than the other choice. It is this choice make people happy and want to learn more.
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition 62
- Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun 60
- Some companies provide important products or services but these products or services also lead to damage on the environment As a consequence some people claim government should resort to greater penalty tax and fine to contain the harm made by these con w 70
- Do you agree or disagree the universities should spend more money in improving facilities libraries computer labs than hiring famous teacher 70
- People can solve important problems in daily life on their own or with the help from families so the help from government is not necessary 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 598, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...le get older, they will enjoy they have a interesting work. For example, world fa...
^
Line 3, column 824, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'enjoyed'.
Suggestion: enjoyed
...out their challenging job, and they are enjoy in it. Another disadvantage of takin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1977.66487455 83% => OK
No of words: 348.0 407.700716846 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69827586207 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40348613624 2.67179642975 90% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 212.727598566 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 618.680645161 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0780177211 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1764705882 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4705882353 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64705882353 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305651758623 0.236089414692 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109815978025 0.076458572812 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149727476452 0.0737576698707 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.261377446104 0.150856017488 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156283179258 0.0645574589148 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 86.8835125448 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.