Life is a burdensome full of ups and downs, and human beings encounter with many problems through their lives that necessitate certain crucial decisions. It is crystal clear that making mistakes is inevitable. Different people react variously when they I observe other's mistakes. Among these options, I, personally, believe that the first attitude—that is—interrupt the leader or the teacher and correct them, carries more weight based on quite a few reasons, two of the most substantial of which are elaborated upon hereunder.
The most compelling reason is that in today's modern world, every company has to be in rush so as not to be left behind in contending for "the field of competition", and companies strive to not only keep their market shares, but also acquire better position in their markets, which brings them about fortune. Therefore, given the existing economic situation and today's unexpected and competitive environment, companies should be more conservative regarding their decisions and evaluate everything before making decision. Otherwise, they may lose anything they have. For example, I know a company, which went bankrupt due to the fact that even though the company's stockholders were aware of the company's manager, they did not say him about his mistakes. If the stockholders had told the manager about his fault, the company would at least kept its market position.
Another advantage of correcting leaders is that making mistakes may affect employees in a negative way. I clarify my point of view with a real story that happened to me. Four years ago, I worked in a company as a sell manager. Once, we had a group discussion in order to decide whether firing policy is a good strategy for our company or not. My boss agreed with the policy, owing to the fact that he believed that on that year, our company's selling product has considerably decreased, and thus we do not make profit. So, we are required to fire some workers to compensate our loss. I understood that my boss's assessments about our selling is not accurate and our selling had not changed in comparison to before, saying him about his mistake. Unless I told him about his mistake, several employees would miss their jobs. In addition, after that my boss appreciated me and told me that correcting his mistake prevent him from bigger mistakes.
In summary, having considered all the aforementioned arguments discussed above, I firmly endorse my point of view that if I were in a meeting or a class and observed the leader's mistake, I will interrupt and correct him or her on the grounds that it avoids some big mistakes, which may be detrimental for both companies and employees. Moreover, it can create a good impression in leaders.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: iPass
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 735, Rule ID: SAY_TELL[1]
Message: 'Say' cannot be followed by a direct personal object. Did you mean 'tell'?
Suggestion: tell
...e of the companys manager, they did not say him about his mistakes. If the stockhol...
^^^
Line 2, column 874, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould at least kept its market position. Another advantage of correcting leaders ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...at making mistakes may affect employees in a negative way. I clarify my point of view with a real...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'regarding', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'as to', 'at least', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in summary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.216796875 0.229887763892 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.1640625 0.158761421928 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.068359375 0.0866891130778 79% => OK
Adverbs: 0.046875 0.046263068375 101% => OK
Pronouns: 0.1015625 0.0685040099705 148% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.12890625 0.118717715034 109% => OK
Participles: 0.044921875 0.0351676179071 128% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84157551064 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.01953125 0.0309702414327 63% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.076171875 0.0887237588012 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015625 0.0209618222197 75% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.01171875 0.0139019557991 84% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2746.0 2387.08602151 115% => OK
No of words: 455.0 408.028673835 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03516483516 5.86048508987 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.48200974243 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.369230769231 0.338922669872 109% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.285714285714 0.251872472559 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.204395604396 0.174417080927 117% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.134065934066 0.112833075102 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84157551064 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.524397521467 111% => OK
Word variations: 72.3108930132 59.2087087015 122% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6684587814 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.75 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.9175482453 48.84282405 174% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.3 120.699889404 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.5533526081 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.644075263715 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.54480286738 54% => OK
Readability: 51.3214285714 45.7405998639 112% => OK
Elegance: 1.25 1.45489161554 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.409354008255 0.300154397459 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.105868677287 0.103427244359 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0767080002947 0.0752933317313 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.437004246908 0.497263757937 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.190674571616 0.151897553556 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120192866231 0.114077575197 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109029188596 0.0781384742642 140% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.291765927476 0.336927656856 87% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0272432192974 0.067059652881 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289599846389 0.210909579961 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501695588912 0.0618886996521 81% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8870967742 50% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.86379928315 311% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.91756272401 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 8.42114695341 71% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 2.4623655914 366% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.6433691756 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.