While giving a feedback, positive comments should be given first or negative comments.
Comments are the expression to judge any statement irrespective of right or wrong. If any feedback is given upon a statement or any work as negative at the first sight, it will create a bad impression on the mind of the writer. So it is better to soften the situation to uphold the positive comments. However, some believe that if the article is right, we should confess otherwise not. We have to disclose it whoever the writer is new-comer or not. I think that’s view has a myriad lacking. Therefore, I will analyze that positive response should be given firstly.
To embark on, negative comments at first analysis will abruptly spoil the mentality of the work. In case of young people or young writer, it works as a negative tonic. To illustrate more, I will share my experience. When I just started writing essays for journal in national dailies, I were hampered a bad situation where our famous Iqbal sir criticized my writing after just collecting it firstly in front of all. In effect I can’t help tolerating such negative and low standard comments. After that, I kept me aloof from writings and eventually I forgot all. On the other hand, if he mended me positively firstly, then criticized my writings personally, I would get advice and direction how to furnish my writings.
Furthermore, negative comments of a feedback never ever create a well-organized society. If we look at the evolution of human development, it is clear to all. When primitive ages, few intellectuals learnt how to make fire, then none oppose the usefulness of it. Conversely, they analyzed it and oversaw what type of benediction it could attain. What I mean by this is that primitive people at first discerned the discovery as a positively to show their feedback, otherwise never such attempts would see light. Likewise, the tall buildings, technology development, microchip all would remain in dark. Take for example, when electricity was first discovered, scientist was provoked as a mad person. But few persons gave a positive feedback to nurture it.
Last but not least, negative first comments dispel the love reactions. In the long run, you will be torn. For example, my aunt is very cunning and always despises others. 4 months ago, I went her house to give her a new-year’s calendar. In response, she criticized my design and told me that I would not like such designer to pack anything. As a result, my mood was off and I cut relationship with her.
- judging teacher as aTV 3
- Always telling truth is the mode to keep relationship well 70
- Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 3
- While giving a feedback, positive comments should be given first or negative comments. 70
- Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well. 71
Comments
433.92Mhz ET-RX-13…
433.92Mhz ET-RX-13 Superheterodyne Receiver Module RF Receiver Module
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 444, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to tolerate' or 'tolerate'.
Suggestion: to tolerate; tolerate
...ont of all. In effect I can't help tolerating such negative and low standard comments...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, so, then, therefore, well, for example, i mean, i think, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2046.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8830548926 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87035682203 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 212.727598566 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577565632458 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6003584229 136% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.7105855556 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0714285714 100.406767564 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9642857143 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78571428571 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.85842293907 337% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291297759232 0.236089414692 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0637458869794 0.076458572812 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714943030129 0.0737576698707 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159364319008 0.150856017488 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635913446289 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 11.7677419355 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.002688172 60% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.