workers are more satisfied with the numerous different tasks in their jobs rather than with similar tasks
Recent decades have witnessed the increasing worktime for people to spend at the word place, so the interesting topic like whether workers are more satisfied with the numerous different tasks in their jobs rather than with similar tasks. As for me, I believe that various tasks in their jobs seem to be better.
Most importantly, various tasks in their jobs tend to be less boring. Just imagine how boring the people who have to do the same task everyday just like the robot are! Unlike the robot, the people are more likely to be frustrated or fewer working passion on their replicated works, and thus their working performance will decrease dramatically with increasing working times. Just like my cousin Joe, a university student who works a part-time job in the restaurant, he always complains to me that his daily job like serving the dishes is so boring, less challenged and even wasting his times. Besides, he believes that all the works he does in the restaurant can be replaced by the robots just like another new restaurant in Guangzhou. Therefore, those works with similar tasks not only lack the encouragement to use the workers' brain but also bring the larger possibilities of replacing by the machine.
In addition, various tasks can promote the working abilities of workers all the ground. The different tasks always mean to require workers to gain some new knowledge or think more about how to improve their working performance. Through varies kinds of tasks, workers will gain lots of experiences which enable them to tackle more challenged problems or win higher positions in their careers. For example, my uncle Jay, an experienced engineer, has become the pioneer of researching the AI technology in his working field, because of his daily working experiences with new and innovative projects. He always told me that the routine, replicated and boring works will convince yourself with satisfactions of what you have done, even though you are out of step with the times. However, those satisfactions cannot bring you opportunities to get promotion.
Admittedly, practice makes perfect, but if those replicated works are outdated or less creative, how could workers make those works more perfect or outstanding? Therefore, the workers should develop a new technique to help them work efficiently, even though some of them need to do some replicated, similar or boring works.
In a word, workers are more satisfied with the different tasks in their jobs rather than with similar tasks, because of less boredom and more encouragement.
- it could be more important to read or watch news about opposite opinions rather than similar opinions 73
- it could be more important to read or watch news about opposite opinions rather than similar opinions 56
- good qualities of good neighbor 60
- Food in the past was much healthier than today 66
- it is more important to read and watch news presented by people whose opinion is different from your own view 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 168, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'numerous'.
Suggestion: numerous
...her workers are more satisfied with the numerous different tasks in their jobs rather than with si...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, as for, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2139.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 419.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10501193317 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71178857134 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 212.727598566 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503579952267 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.1344086022 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8177765695 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.6875 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1875 20.6045352989 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.428428629616 0.236089414692 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164006541018 0.076458572812 215% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.182028538589 0.0737576698707 247% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.338894624145 0.150856017488 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.231710362044 0.0645574589148 359% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 11.7677419355 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 58.1214874552 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.0537634409 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.