Workers’ satisfaction and happiness are of vital importance in every working environment, and there are various methods to enhance workers’ motivation. There has been no shortage of debates among individuals on whether workers are happier when they do different tasks during their workday, or when they do the same task over and over again. I vehemently cling to the notion that if workers do various types of tasks, they will be more satisfied. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into two of my most prominent reasons for advocating this viewpoint.
First and foremost, doing the same task repeatedly every day could reduce the workers’ focus on that task, and they wouldn’t pay too much attention to what they’re doing. Therefore, in the long run, this will reduce the company’s efficiency, and produce low-quality goods, or worst, workers might harm themselves due to lack of attention and lethargy. On the other hand, if workers do different work every day, they wouldn’t get used to it. Moreover, this would increase the workers’ safety in the workplace. A personal example can drive this notion home. My uncle works at a car factory, and he’s responsible for one of the pressing machines. He’s been doing this for about 20 years now, and he’s really used to this job. One day, due to fatigue, he accidentally put his hand under the machine and lost his hand. This example clearly illustrates the negative impact of doing the same task for a long period of time.
Furthermore, another equally compelling reason for corroborating my stance lies in the fact that doing different types of tasks can boost workers’ morale, and help them to approach their work with enthusiasm and diligence, which in the long run will increase the factory’s effectiveness and production. Everyone starts to feel overwhelmed and frustrated by doing the exact same thing over time. In fact, a lot of mental and social problems in contemporary society originated from doing ordinary tasks repeatedly. Diversity can make our lives more fulfilling and enable us to pursue our passions and desires. For instance, a recent study shows that people who deal with various arduous obstacles every day, are more likely to lead a gratifying life, and they're less likely to be diagnosed with depression and anxiety in their life.
To put it all in nutshell, having all the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I strongly believe that people will be more delighted with their vocation when they face different barriers, on the ground that they would pay more attention to their job and do it more precisely, as well as it would enhance workers’ eagerness.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country 73
- TOEFL T P O 42 Integrated Writing Task 3
- TPO 42 Integrated Writing Task Glass is a favored building material for modern architecture yet it is also very dangerous for wild birds Because they often cannot distinguish between glass and open air millions of birds are harmed every year when the 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- TPO 66 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People who develop many different skills are more successful than people who focus on one skill only Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 902, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...mpact of doing the same task for a long period of time. Furthermore, another equally compel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 754, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...e likely to lead a gratifying life, and theyre less likely to be diagnosed with depres...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09545454545 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75761530108 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543181818182 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.9814525994 48.9658058833 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388321926823 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109624275257 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105538872201 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246891746326 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694862765933 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 902, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...mpact of doing the same task for a long period of time. Furthermore, another equally compel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 754, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...e likely to lead a gratifying life, and theyre less likely to be diagnosed with depres...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, really, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in fact, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 13.8261648746 166% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 52.1666666667 104% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2242.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09545454545 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75761530108 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 212.727598566 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543181818182 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.9814525994 48.9658058833 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1578947368 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36842105263 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388321926823 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109624275257 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105538872201 0.0737576698707 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246891746326 0.150856017488 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694862765933 0.0645574589148 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.